Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I actually saw this moonbounce today and figured out that you live very close to me in DC. (hi there).
What's even more astonishing about this moonbounce-in-the-street is that the party hosts blocked off a secondary arterial street in the District.
You know, a thru street that isn't allowed to have speed bumps installed, ever, because emergency vehicles use that road as their go-to thru street.
There was a MPD officer there, so I assume the whole thing was legit and permitted but .... since when does a private residential party for tots get precedence to close down a thru arterial in the District, 2 blocks from a Metro?
Are the neighbors rich and connected?
Anonymous wrote:OP, I actually saw this moonbounce today and figured out that you live very close to me in DC. (hi there).
What's even more astonishing about this moonbounce-in-the-street is that the party hosts blocked off a secondary arterial street in the District.
You know, a thru street that isn't allowed to have speed bumps installed, ever, because emergency vehicles use that road as their go-to thru street.
There was a MPD officer there, so I assume the whole thing was legit and permitted but .... since when does a private residential party for tots get precedence to close down a thru arterial in the District, 2 blocks from a Metro?
Anonymous wrote:Set up a sprinkler to water that corner of the yard before the party begins.
Anonymous wrote:If OP lives in the district she doesn't own the street in front of her house. In fact, she doesn't own a chunk of her front yard. It belongs to the city. Thus, not her risk.
