Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So here is the question.....
If Bob the Senior at TJ has a class rank that is in the bottom 5% of his class (after all, everyone can't be Valedictorian), and he applies to UVA, and Joe the Senior at Lake Braddock has a class rank in the top 10% of his class, which one do you think gets in, assuming their SATs are equal?
This is a trick question, right? Because Bob the senior at TJ is applying to Virginia Tech, not UVA.
But to answer your question, lowest 5 percent of his class at TJ is still higher than top 10% elsewhere. The standards are just different.
That's actually wrong. Because the number of qualified applicants to TJ far exceeds the number of spots, and because the application to TJ is holistic and somewhat subjective beyond the entrance exam, there are lots of kids who would have been highly successful at TJ who don't get accepted and continue attending their base schools. Conversely, because the test is actually not that difficult, it only sets a minimum standard for getting into the semifinalist pool, so that the SIS, recommendations etc. carry outsize influence in the admissions process even though they probably have a low correlation with academic ability--in other words, once you're in the pool it becomes much harder to discriminate the very good students from the outstanding ones. Every year there are stories in the paper around the time admission decisions are sent out, about such and such Math Olympiad student or science fair winner who wasn't admitted "even though much weaker students got in."
There are also children who are admitted and in the end decide not to attend TJ and remain at their base school.
Finally, while colleges are duly impressed by TJ, they are not just looking for STEM candidates and will seek out terrific students who, in the absence of a humanities magnet, stayed at their base school because they have little interest in STEM.