Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"We have 50 years of evidence that racial prejudice predicts voting. Republicans are supported by whites with prejudice against blacks.
Why are you getting all upset Man? What percentage of blacks when presented with, equally qualified white candidate, and a black candidate vote for the black candidate? It really goes both ways but that article you cited failed to look at the opposite end.
Do you mean one justifies the other?
Anonymous wrote:"We have 50 years of evidence that racial prejudice predicts voting. Republicans are supported by whites with prejudice against blacks.
Why are you getting all upset Man? What percentage of blacks when presented with, equally qualified white candidate, and a black candidate vote for the black candidate? It really goes both ways but that article you cited failed to look at the opposite end.
Anonymous wrote:I am a republican and I like Cain because of his positions--not because he is African-American. Other repubs dislike Cain because of his positions--not because he is African-American. It is that simple. The eventual candidate will get the nomination based upon ideals and positions not because of race. You demean everyone's intelligence--including yours--when you try to tie everything to an issue of race. Enough already.
Anonymous wrote:Why are you getting all upset Man? What percentage of blacks when presented with, equally qualified white candidate, and a black candidate vote for the black candidate? It really goes both ways but that article you cited failed to look at the opposite end.
Anonymous wrote:ok, did the study ask if black democrats are more prejudiced against whites? if not, dumb.
But if you want to start your own country and call it Moronville, please feel free and hopefully others like you will join you.[/quote
]
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:"We have 50 years of evidence that racial prejudice predicts voting. Republicans are supported by whites with prejudice against blacks.
Why are you getting all upset Man? What percentage of blacks when presented with, equally qualified white candidate, and a black candidate vote for the black candidate? It really goes both ways but that article you cited failed to look at the opposite end.
TheManWithAUsername wrote:Anonymous wrote:TheManWithAUsername wrote:Second, instead of just blah blah blah from your personal self-evaluation and your casual judgment of what you see around you, why not look at the data? The studies show that Reps are more racist - i.e., that a Rep is more likely to think less of a black man.
read the entire studies - what do they say about prejudices of Democrats? everyone is prejudiced. dumb.
What are you talking about? What's dumb? What are you saying that they say about the prejudices of Dems?
The point I pulled from the studies is that a Rep is more likely to think less of a black person. Show me something there that says otherwise.
This kind of obstinate ignorance is so disturbing. You encounter it in all kinds of contexts - I just did in another forum here, in a discussion of vasectomies. It's like a huge portion of this country has forgotten that science works, that it produces much better outcomes than pulling ideas out of your ass.
This just brings me back to wishing for a formal split of the country. I don't know how sensible people are supposed to negotiate policy with dedicated anti-rationalists. You don't want any part of our highfalutin experiments, studies, and statistics? You'd rather go with your gut, what your cleric tells you, or whatever the fuck you morons look to? That fine - let's split, and we'll see who does better.
Anonymous wrote:TheManWithAUsername wrote:Second, instead of just blah blah blah from your personal self-evaluation and your casual judgment of what you see around you, why not look at the data? The studies show that Reps are more racist - i.e., that a Rep is more likely to think less of a black man.
read the entire studies - what do they say about prejudices of Democrats? everyone is prejudiced. dumb.
Anonymous wrote:Do you deny that their are Dems who wouldn't vote for a candidate because he/she is a Morman/Catholic/Jew/African-American/Caucasian/Insert word of your choice. What is your point? There are bigots on both side of the aisle. Neither party is immune.