Anonymous wrote:Entirely unrelated question: if the mission of this school is true bilingualism, why the $^@% did they drop pk-3?
Everyone knows the best window to begin language acquisition is those early years. Starting at 4 instead 3 strikes me as incredibly stupid. Space and budget concerns, assuming they exist, should've been foisted on another grade or aspect of the curriculum.
Ahem. Believe it or not, deciding to add a year of instruction actually requires a charter ammendment. Have you taken a look at the charter application process? And weighed it against the priorities of new construction and middle school preparation? No?
I didn't think so.