Anonymous wrote:You people are so judgmental...
Changing a child's name is common practice in international adoption... whether it's an infant or a 7-year-old, it doesn't make a difference.
Americanization... happens. The child is no longer in his birth country, he can no longer speak his native tongue, he lives in a world of different smells, food, clothes, customs, sometimes even religion... so the name change, in that context, is but one small thing on the top of everything else. How parents approach it is key to how the child takes it.
From a parent's perspective, changing the child's name is an additional way to bond with him or her. It's not about love being conditional; it's about the human process of bonding with a child who did not come out of one's womb and who lived in another part of the world for 7 years.
And the name change is always a very exciting part of adoption, as it marks one's "claiming" by a family. For the child it's like a rite of passage...
"Let her decide whether she wants to change her name" seems to be a recurrent idea. HELLO?! She's 7 YEARS-OLD. Of course she will have an opinion, but chances are high that she will either 1- accept to please her parents; 2- refuse because she is overwhelmed by changes or 3- have an unreasonable idea.
So by all means, if you want to change your child's name, do it.
I am speaking from personal experience. I am adoption an older girl from Ethiopia and intend on taking the same approach.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the dad provided some easy answers for you so you stopped being so nosy.
Easy - yes. Well-thought out -- definitely not. I can tell you that we have gotten questions from our son, adopted as an infant, about why we changed his name. He even once asked, "didn't you like it?" We kept it as a middle name.
This family should not have been approved to adopt internationally, IMO. They don't show any signs of having thought about the issues associated with adopting internationally, especially adopting an older, institutionalized child. I wish them luck - I think they're going to be in for a lot of problems.
He just became a new dad to a child who is older and transitioning to a whole new world essentially ... he doesn't owe anyone a "well thought out" reply.
As far as the name, for all we know or the OP knows, "Oksana" may very well be a default orphanage name that is given to girls and her parents wanted to give her a name - perhaps even one the girl selected herself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the dad provided some easy answers for you so you stopped being so nosy.
Easy - yes. Well-thought out -- definitely not. I can tell you that we have gotten questions from our son, adopted as an infant, about why we changed his name. He even once asked, "didn't you like it?" We kept it as a middle name.
This family should not have been approved to adopt internationally, IMO. They don't show any signs of having thought about the issues associated with adopting internationally, especially adopting an older, institutionalized child. I wish them luck - I think they're going to be in for a lot of problems.
Anonymous wrote:11:40 here. I agree that it is a given she will lose her Russian within a year. When I mentioned "activities" I wasn't even thinking about Russian summer camps or language classes. I think that would put an undue burden on the family. They have enough problems trying to integrate this child into their family and teach her English, and now they have to pay for Russian classes, too? As for Russian embassy sponsored events, my first reaction is stay the hell away, although I admit that's just my personal prejudice.
The one thing in particular I was thinking about was this art studio in Gaithersburg. It has a very open, creative atmosphere, something that could be beneficial and therapeutic to all their children during this stressful time. The classes are in English, but the teacher and many of the students are Russian, and it's a good way to meet nice, happy, well-adjusted Russian children and adults, again something both the children and the parents can benefit from.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a possibility that the girl wants it. A friend of mine adopted a child from Africa (9 yrs old) who asked to change her name, and who wants to be more American.
The girl from Russia may have no positive memories of Russia. It would be wrong of the parents to force a connection she doesn't want.
Or it could really be as PP stated - that the adoptive parents don't want their child to have any ties and to not be different than their other kids.
What would you expect a child to say. This child is adapting to a new language. A new culture. A new country. A new family. She wants to fit in. Is it the best thing in the long run, more than likely not. It is not good to try and erase a child's entire existence and think it just began they day she was adopted. Perhaps it would have been different if the child was adopted as an infant. I still still suggested using the birth name as a middle name. I think your friend should have read the blogs from the adult adoptees on this subject. The majority, who blog, have serious issues regarding the erasure of their past. Just my thoughts.
This girl was raped when she was 7. Spent the last 2 years living with American missionaries. She wants to start life "new". Of course, life here doesn't erase what happened to her. But trying to force a connection with a culture she wants nothing to do with isn't right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the dad provided some easy answers for you so you stopped being so nosy.
Easy - yes. Well-thought out -- definitely not. I can tell you that we have gotten questions from our son, adopted as an infant, about why we changed his name. He even once asked, "didn't you like it?" We kept it as a middle name.
This family should not have been approved to adopt internationally, IMO. They don't show any signs of having thought about the issues associated with adopting internationally, especially adopting an older, institutionalized child. I wish them luck - I think they're going to be in for a lot of problems.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a possibility that the girl wants it. A friend of mine adopted a child from Africa (9 yrs old) who asked to change her name, and who wants to be more American.
The girl from Russia may have no positive memories of Russia. It would be wrong of the parents to force a connection she doesn't want.
Or it could really be as PP stated - that the adoptive parents don't want their child to have any ties and to not be different than their other kids.
What would you expect a child to say. This child is adapting to a new language. A new culture. A new country. A new family. She wants to fit in. Is it the best thing in the long run, more than likely not. It is not good to try and erase a child's entire existence and think it just began they day she was adopted. Perhaps it would have been different if the child was adopted as an infant. I still still suggested using the birth name as a middle name. I think your friend should have read the blogs from the adult adoptees on this subject. The majority, who blog, have serious issues regarding the erasure of their past. Just my thoughts.
Anonymous wrote:I think the dad provided some easy answers for you so you stopped being so nosy.