Anonymous wrote:Same for me. My dad made a pretty good salary and since he "never went to college and I got a good paying job" he didn't contribute much for my college. I would never sign an agreement stipulating how much $$$ I would need to contribute to my kids' college education 10+ years in advance (in a divorce agreement). Who knows where they will be financially when the kid turns 18 and starts college? I'd be legally "on the hook" for the amount or % of the tuition b/c of the divorce agreement. What if I had lost a job recently? What if I were unemployed? Just doesn't make financial sense to agree to something so far in advance.
Anonymous wrote:hi all our situation is a bit different I never married the woman that have my twins but I have been paying child support. I am in the military and just wanted to know will this child support stop at the age of 18? do I still have to pay child support if they go to college. really need your help I pay $1500 a month for child support.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to be rude but if it only goes through age 18, why would a non-custodial parent sign an agreement saying that he/she is required to pay for college? I grew up in MD and when my parents divorced, my dad only paid through age 18 for me and my brother. If that is the law, why would a parent sign something that required them to pay beyond age 18?
Some people want to do right by their kids and have no problem steadying to that![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to be rude but if it only goes through age 18, why would a non-custodial parent sign an agreement saying that he/she is required to pay for college? I grew up in MD and when my parents divorced, my dad only paid through age 18 for me and my brother. If that is the law, why would a parent sign something that required them to pay beyond age 18?
Some people want to do right by their kids and have no problem steadying to that![]()
Anonymous wrote:Not trying to be rude but if it only goes through age 18, why would a non-custodial parent sign an agreement saying that he/she is required to pay for college? I grew up in MD and when my parents divorced, my dad only paid through age 18 for me and my brother. If that is the law, why would a parent sign something that required them to pay beyond age 18?
why would the kids know what was in the divorce agreement? it's private, isn't it?Anonymous wrote:My sister's divorce attorney counseled my sister and her ex-husband not to put anything about paying for college into the divorce agreement. They both totally intend to pay for college for their two girls, but the attorney said that he had seen a number of occasions where the kids used the fact that the parents were legally obligated to pay to hold both of the parents hostage while they partied away their time at college on their parents dime. Most kids would not do this, but it might be better to leave yourself some flexibility in how college expenses are divided up so that the parents can make the best decision for their kids at the time that college is actually on the table.
Anonymous wrote:
Nobody is custodial parent for a child over 18 (once done with high school). I went to college, and both of my parents incomes were calculated for financial aid, even though NEITHER of them were contributing (they are married). That's life, suck it up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to be rude but if it only goes through age 18, why would a non-custodial parent sign an agreement saying that he/she is required to pay for college? I grew up in MD and when my parents divorced, my dad only paid through age 18 for me and my brother. If that is the law, why would a parent sign something that required them to pay beyond age 18?
Are you really questioning why parents would put into writing an agreement that involves doing more than the bare legal minimum for their children? I mean, there's no law saying you have to give your kids piano lessons, or take them to visit their grandparents, but I'm sure many divorce agreements include stipulations about paying for or providing things that aren't legally required.
It's worth remembering that college financial aid formulas generally assume both parents will be contributing, regardless of custody. My friend was screwed by this - even though non-custodial dad told the school that he had no intention to ever provide a penny for her tuition or expenses, her aid was figured based on both her mom AND dad's household incomes.
Anonymous wrote:I think the judge can stipulate that it goes through college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to be rude but if it only goes through age 18, why would a non-custodial parent sign an agreement saying that he/she is required to pay for college? I grew up in MD and when my parents divorced, my dad only paid through age 18 for me and my brother. If that is the law, why would a parent sign something that required them to pay beyond age 18?
Because the parent (custodial or not) wants what is best for the child.