Anonymous wrote:I live in a 2 BR TH way out in the burbs...because it is what we can afford on a median DC-area income. It isn't about "priorities" - we simple cannot spend the kind of cash it takes to buy downtown.
Yes, maybe a large portion of YOUR friends in your high income part of DC can afford $700K (or $600K, for that matter) and sure, people moving from NYC think they have it made when they move here and can "afford" something downtown. But to say only those moving from Houston or the midwest think this area is too expensive is ludicrous.
DC is only expensive to those who move here from some place like Houston or Lincoln, Nebraska.
Anonymous wrote:I live in an affordable house in DC, I walk to work, my daughter has a school she loves. Last Saturday we walked to the farmers market met up with friends at the pool and spend the afternoon at a playground. Yeah, it's rough living in DC.
Anonymous wrote:"That DC schools are uniformly bad seems to be an article of faith to those who left for the 'burbs. Some are; some aren't. There's definitely a sunk-cost effect going on as parents sit in traffic for 2 or 3 hours a day--after all, we're doing it for the kids! "
Don't you realize that many people no longer work in the city proper? It's not 1990 anymore.
Anonymous wrote:That DC schools are uniformly bad seems to be an article of faith to those who left for the 'burbs. Some are; some aren't. There's definitely a sunk-cost effect going on as parents sit in traffic for 2 or 3 hours a day--after all, we're doing it for the kids!
Yes, apparently the refrain 'DCPS sucks" actually means that there are no acceptable public schools anywhere in DC. Which is of course not true. In fact, when you add in the charters, there are quite a few that are good, at least for elementary school.
Anonymous wrote:If you read the article it also notes that they relied heavily on culture and charm for kids (museums, kid friendly restaurants, outdoor music festivals, other stuf like that). So it makes sense that D.C. would be high ranked and Arlington fell to number 70! I actually find that there are a lot more affordable places to live in D.C. than in Arlington housing wise if you are willing to step out of NW. I used to live at the waterfront and felt perfectly safe there. There are some awesome large townhomes that are under 600K, plus you are close to the metro. Schools are another story in that neighborhood but I would send my kids to many of the charter schools in D.C.
That DC schools are uniformly bad seems to be an article of faith to those who left for the 'burbs. Some are; some aren't. There's definitely a sunk-cost effect going on as parents sit in traffic for 2 or 3 hours a day--after all, we're doing it for the kids!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You do realize that $700K is a HECK of a lot of money, right? A huge portion of the population of THIS area cannot afford that.
Well of course not. But a close-in 3 BR row house is a luxury item. We live in a 2BR/1BA 1000 sq ft rowhouse. It's small enough that "a huge portion of the population of THIS area" would scoff at the idea of living here. People make choices based on their priorities.
Anyway, the reason it's expensive is that a big portion of the population of this area can afford it. Otherwise it would be cheaper. You're competing now just with folks in this area, but all up and down the east coast. As I said, I know many couples who've moved out of NYC area to live in DC and are just happy they could afford a walkable, urban neighborhood that's *cheap*. At least relatively speaking. They move into a 700 sq foot rowhouse and can't believe how spacious it is.
Anyway, if Conde Nast put out an issue where they ranked Costa Rica as the number one vacation destination, would you reject that because a huge portion of the population of this area cannot afford to go? Of course not.
If I happened across a list that said that Costa Rica was the #1 vacation destination because it has fabulous skiing and you will receive a million dollars the moment you arrive, yes, I would reject that list, because neither of those things is true.