Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:45
Subject: Re:Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
Anonymous wrote:I think those headbands are adorable. I have a boy, but if I ever have a girl I'll definitely use them. (especially if the girl is like my son and doesn't get hair until 2.5)!!
Is there a correlation between educational levels and those who buy this shit?
Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:38
Subject: Re:Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
I think those headbands are adorable. I have a boy, but if I ever have a girl I'll definitely use them. (especially if the girl is like my son and doesn't get hair until 2.5)!!
Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:33
Subject: Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
Not much of a fan for my own kid, but she was born with a head full of hair. Still they seem to work on other people's kids.
Honestly, I don't have enough of an opinion on this kind of thing to start a whole thread.
What I DO have an opinion on is why there isn't more green or red clothing in the girls' department.
Honestly, I don't have enough of an opinion on this kind of thing to start a whole thread.
What I DO have an opinion on is why there isn't more green or red clothing in the girls' department.
Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:32
Subject: Re:Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
cuzimawesome wrote:These? They're kinda cute, but I've never been a fan of any kind of headband on a baby girl. I actually think these are cuter than those thin ones that moms put on their babies. But yeah... still not a fan, but to each his own! This is not an ugly baby by the way.
EW, it looks like a tumor.
Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:30
Subject: Re:Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
Anonymous wrote:My infant daughter occasionally sports a giant flower headband (she even has a bright pink one - so ha!).
She doesn't, however, care in the least what any of you think of it. Nor do I.
And to the poster who added: "most of the infants are hideous as well" - I'm fairly sure that my daughter has better manners and judgment than you at 3 months.
Thanks for the wonderful exchange on this Wednesday morning.
Train wreck alert!
Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:30
Subject: Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
I do know a mom of a baby with one of those two names who dresses her in these. Was the PP's comment about a specific child - or more about the idea that if you're likely to name your kid something trendy and last-name-y like Addison or Emerson, you're more likely to put gigantoid, fake flowers on your daughter's head?
cuzimawesome
04/20/2011 09:25
Subject: Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
Anonymous wrote:cuzimawesome wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.
On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!
How can one make a fool of themself on an anonymous forum in cyberspace? Even when it's a grammatical error?
Hahaha perhaps by referring to a lexicographic error as a grammatical error? I don't care if it's anonymous. The fool saying a 3 mo is not an infant has shown themselves to be a fool, whether identified or not.
"I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves."
Can you reallly be so dumb?
Dude. Are people really arguing over this?
You don't see the irony?
Ha! It took me a moment.
Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:22
Subject: Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
cuzimawesome wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.
On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!
How can one make a fool of themself on an anonymous forum in cyberspace? Even when it's a grammatical error?
Hahaha perhaps by referring to a lexicographic error as a grammatical error? I don't care if it's anonymous. The fool saying a 3 mo is not an infant has shown themselves to be a fool, whether identified or not.
"I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves."
Can you reallly be so dumb?
Dude. Are people really arguing over this?
You don't see the irony?
cuzimawesome
04/20/2011 09:18
Subject: Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.
On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!
How can one make a fool of themself on an anonymous forum in cyberspace? Even when it's a grammatical error?
Hahaha perhaps by referring to a lexicographic error as a grammatical error? I don't care if it's anonymous. The fool saying a 3 mo is not an infant has shown themselves to be a fool, whether identified or not.
"I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves."
Can you reallly be so dumb?
Dude. Are people really arguing over this?
Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:16
Subject: Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.
On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!
How can one make a fool of themself on an anonymous forum in cyberspace? Even when it's a grammatical error?
Hahaha perhaps by referring to a lexicographic error as a grammatical error? I don't care if it's anonymous. The fool saying a 3 mo is not an infant has shown themselves to be a fool, whether identified or not.
"I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves."
Can you reallly be so dumb?
Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:14
Subject: Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.
On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!
How can one make a fool of themself on an anonymous forum in cyberspace? Even when it's a grammatical error?
Hahaha perhaps by referring to a lexicographic error as a grammatical error? I don't care if it's anonymous. The fool saying a 3 mo is not an infant has shown themselves to be a fool, whether identified or not.
Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:08
Subject: Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
Anonymous wrote:Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.
On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!
How can one make a fool of themself on an anonymous forum in cyberspace? Even when it's a grammatical error?
Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:08
Subject: Re:Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
I know a girl from hs that has a DD that is 4 months old and apparently has the girl in headbands everyday (ala fb pictures). She has even taken it a step further and broke out her glue gun and is selling these dumb things on etsy
Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:07
Subject: Re:Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My infant daughter occasionally sports a giant flower headband (she even has a bright pink one - so ha!).
She doesn't, however, care in the least what any of you think of it. Nor do I.
And to the poster who added: "most of the infants are hideous as well" - I'm fairly sure that my daughter has better manners and judgment than you at 3 months.
Thanks for the wonderful exchange on this Wednesday morning.
What does that have to do with how cute an infant looks? And at 3 months, your baby is no longer and "infant". Just say baby since she is no longer fresh from the womb.
You are a truly stupid, ignorant, and just a plain dumbass.
Anonymous
04/20/2011 09:04
Subject: Those giant flower headbands on infants are hideous
Eh I like them, haven't shelled out for one yet, but would def put my 5.5 mo INFANT in one.
On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!
On a separate note, I love when someone tries to say something snarky and ends up making a total fool of themselves. Good morning dcum!!!