Anonymous wrote:Yes, agreed. Songs are great but my kids are in portables. Let's end the boondoggle immersion programs and hire more staff or expand buildings. If you want Chinese language education, pay for it privately after school or on the weekends.
Anonymous wrote:We have two kids in the Potomac Elementary Mandarin program who are thriving. Since we only speak English, it's hard for me to gauge their level of fluency. But I can say that they enjoy learning Mandarin, they talk to each other in Mandarin, and their Mandarin songs sound great. The most important thing is that they really like going to school. It seems like a lot of the detractors of the program don't have kids in the program. Just two of my oldest daughter's classmates have have dropped out of the Mandarin program - one because they moved out of town. None have left my younger daughter's class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is an entitlement program that does not teach language fluency.
What do you mean by entitlement program? Non-native speakers with kids in the program would much rather have kids be fluent. Since it is only partial immersion, it will never happen.
It is a program for a particular school (Potomac) and many parents choose the program not for the language benefits but for the other perceived benefits. Smaller classes, consistent teachers, small community within a larger school. Academically it offers no advantages and has proven to be a failure. Yet the entitled parents at PES refuse tol et it go because they feel entitled to the other aforementioned benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You guys realize that Chinese is not a language...just saying....
Are you referring to Mandarin or Cantonese maybe?
Any schools have Mexican immersion?![]()
Duh.
Chinese isn't a language any more than European is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You guys realize that Chinese is not a language...just saying....
Are you referring to Mandarin or Cantonese maybe?
Any schools have Mexican immersion?![]()