Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't have student there now but just looked at them recently on a day trip to Boston. Not a fan of NEU - way too transactional. Really liked BU for what my kids is interested in. Also, I'm old-fashioned and like a school that has some requirements. For sure going to dissuade NEU and encourage BU. Loved BU campus and location. Didn't like NEU campus as much.
That's usually the opposite of people's reaction to BU's campus. It stretches along Comm Ave with interruptions from commercial businesses so you don't even have a campus feel. Northeastern has more of a campus feel with the way that their buildings are structured.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Northeastern is a commuter school and BU is really just an over glorified private school that should be public. UMass better than both.
Maybe this used to be true but no longer. See the post about Syracuse's woes - its profile has gone down while BU's and NEU's have skyrocketed, and the latter schools' location has almost everything to do with that.
BU and Northeastern receive a massive Boston advantage. International undergraduate applicants alone are huge to both colleges. Northeastern also ihas a city-imposed cap on the number of freshman so scarcity drives up value.
If Syracuse was in Boston it would be thought of as the equivalent of BU, BC, NEU and Tufts.
A Syracuse fan really digging deep here. So if Syracuse had a premiere location like Boston it could be thought of as on the level of a commuter school or a glorified public beneath UMass?
I'm not the "Syracuse fan" but you are doubling and tripling down on being wrong. It's been 30+ years since your descriptors of BU and NEU were accurate.
Anonymous wrote:How do those compare with Tufts or BC?
Anonymous wrote:Don't have student there now but just looked at them recently on a day trip to Boston. Not a fan of NEU - way too transactional. Really liked BU for what my kids is interested in. Also, I'm old-fashioned and like a school that has some requirements. For sure going to dissuade NEU and encourage BU. Loved BU campus and location. Didn't like NEU campus as much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Northeastern is a commuter school and BU is really just an over glorified private school that should be public. UMass better than both.
Maybe this used to be true but no longer. See the post about Syracuse's woes - its profile has gone down while BU's and NEU's have skyrocketed, and the latter schools' location has almost everything to do with that.
BU and Northeastern receive a massive Boston advantage. International undergraduate applicants alone are huge to both colleges. Northeastern also ihas a city-imposed cap on the number of freshman so scarcity drives up value.
If Syracuse was in Boston it would be thought of as the equivalent of BU, BC, NEU and Tufts.
Anonymous wrote:Neither are worth taking out loans for - be careful! An undergrad degree at either is not worth $400K
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Northeastern is a commuter school and BU is really just an over glorified private school that should be public. UMass better than both.
Maybe this used to be true but no longer. See the post about Syracuse's woes - its profile has gone down while BU's and NEU's have skyrocketed, and the latter schools' location has almost everything to do with that.
BU and Northeastern receive a massive Boston advantage. International undergraduate applicants alone are huge to both colleges. Northeastern also ihas a city-imposed cap on the number of freshman so scarcity drives up value.
If Syracuse was in Boston it would be thought of as the equivalent of BU, BC, NEU and Tufts.
A Syracuse fan really digging deep here. So if Syracuse had a premiere location like Boston it could be thought of as on the level of a commuter school or a glorified public beneath UMass?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Northeastern is a commuter school and BU is really just an over glorified private school that should be public. UMass better than both.
Maybe this used to be true but no longer. See the post about Syracuse's woes - its profile has gone down while BU's and NEU's have skyrocketed, and the latter schools' location has almost everything to do with that.
BU and Northeastern receive a massive Boston advantage. International undergraduate applicants alone are huge to both colleges. Northeastern also ihas a city-imposed cap on the number of freshman so scarcity drives up value.
If Syracuse was in Boston it would be thought of as the equivalent of BU, BC, NEU and Tufts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Northeastern is a commuter school and BU is really just an over glorified private school that should be public. UMass better than both.
Maybe this used to be true but no longer. See the post about Syracuse's woes - its profile has gone down while BU's and NEU's have skyrocketed, and the latter schools' location has almost everything to do with that.
Anonymous wrote:Northeastern is a commuter school and BU is really just an over glorified private school that should be public. UMass better than both.
Anonymous wrote:Northeastern is a commuter school and BU is really just an over glorified private school that should be public. UMass better than both.
Anonymous wrote:How do those compare with Tufts or BC?