Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I doubt JLG wants a carryover from the Bowser administration in such a critical role.

Idk, as a teacher Kim Jackson doesn’t seem so evil. She was an IS before, I heard from senior teachers that she was wonderful.

I guess only time will tell. She has a whole semester to show she isn’t just a showman like Furby.

Some IS roles do need change, the double dipper is the first one who needs to go.

Kim Jackson is a deeply wonderful person, from my perspective as an observant parent who had her as a principal. The teachers were very loyal to her and sad to see her go, but made a call to accept her AP as the next principal in the hopes that she would carry on everything Ms. Jackson had established ( which she did -- they skipped over the panel selection to just put the AP in place). That kind of loyalty seems rare. She cared about every kid. She was a problem solver and every interaction I had with her was very direct, warm, and engaging.

Honestly this seems like one of the best decisions Bowser has made during the ENTIRE course of her leadership and JLG would be wise to consider making it permanent.

It was a good decision on Bowser's part (much better than if she had chosen the current number two, the deputy chancellor of SEAD), I nonetheless doubt that JLG is going to keep any high ranking Bowser appointee especially not in an area where one of her main supporters (WTU) is insistent upon complete change of the "status quo".