Anonymous wrote:Proof that lacs still can't make it to the top
Anonymous wrote:This one is better.
https://collegerankings.city-journal.org/rankings?sort=2&order=asc
Our rankings combine publicly available information from sources such as the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), the Department of Education’s College Scorecard, and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression’s College Free Speech Rankings. We also developed original measures exclusively for this project, such as the ideological balance of student political organizations and the partisan makeup of faculty campaign contributions.
Anonymous wrote:Notable Pairings
Williams
Amherst
W&L
Davidson
Bates
Colby
Bucknell
Lafayette
Anonymous wrote:It's nice to see the LACs in with the rest at least.
Anonymous wrote:If you click around, you'll see:
40% outcome
20% academics
20% selectivity
20% campus life
Of course, how each of these categories is defined is not immediately obvious.
Anonymous wrote:Berkeley is so much lower than UCLA (and Michigan)…puzzling!
Anonymous wrote:It’s a list, put together by someone which roughly tracks the already known. It’s not a bad list but it says nothing new. The top R1s are the top R1s and the top SLACs are the top SLACs. One could quibble with it but why, there is nothing new.
Anonymous wrote:https://subject.com/subject100