She’s not questioning if YouTube is a good source of information and comes in handy but the double standard, that they will deem comments inappropriate but at the same time allow fake videos that do a lot more damage.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you missed the point of the postAnonymous wrote:OP, water finds its own level.
The fact you watch that stuff, and react to it... speaks more about you than anything else.
YouTube is the most terrific free learning resource out there. Just don't be stupid.
What was the point of the post?
Anonymous wrote:I think you missed the point of the postAnonymous wrote:OP, water finds its own level.
The fact you watch that stuff, and react to it... speaks more about you than anything else.
YouTube is the most terrific free learning resource out there. Just don't be stupid.
I think you missed the point of the postAnonymous wrote:OP, water finds its own level.
The fact you watch that stuff, and react to it... speaks more about you than anything else.
YouTube is the most terrific free learning resource out there. Just don't be stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They continue to censor their comment sections if someone posts comments that YouTube deems inappropriate but yet the allow the uploading of AI videos that are 100% fake of events that never actually happened such as Mister Rogers sitting in his living room using a bong or Muhammad Ali dancing on Soul Train.
All the advertisements before videos are getting more annoying as well.
Am I just getting old?
Is it just me?
YouTube doesn’t choose the ad. They’re programmatic ads and are part of a fairly complex marketplace running behind the videos consumers see