Anonymous wrote:There’s no entitlement that all schools in the same district or all districts in the state have the same educational programs and opportunities available. If you could show a lack of access on the basis of race, national origin, or disability, you *might* have a claim. But you’d a) need to have a child from the harmed group and b) generally need to show an intent to discriminate (disparate impact claims are basically dead).
Anonymous wrote:If my kid gets accepted a magnet and we move to a high school that is in another region for 10th grade, can they go to the corresponding magnet program in the new region?
Anonymous wrote:If my kid gets accepted a magnet and we move to a high school that is in another region for 10th grade, can they go to the corresponding magnet program in the new region?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not a lawyer but I don’t think you have a case. Equity does not mean providing the exact same programs at every school. The school district is legally obligated to provide free access to a reasonable education approved by the state and it fulfills that requirement. As long as it is providing equivalent opportunities in each region, there is no basis to sue. Equivalent is different from identical. If only certain regions had access to specialized programming, then you could sue. But every region has specialized programs. You’re just not happy with the actual selection in your region. But it is impossible to satisfy every family in every region so the bar would be impossible to meet for MCPS
Then why not open up the access to these specialized programs the way they used to for Blair, Poolesville - have one upcounty and one down county school have it and 3 regions have access to each
Or make these specialized programs available to all in the county, make it criteria based like Richard Montgomery used to be.
Because they don’t want to spend the transportation money I think.
Yes. Transportation is expensive and a logistical nightmare. And the criteria for admission also end up being imperfect and have issues. Engineering in HS is nice to have but by no means necessary to becoming an engineer. And you have the option to move inbounds to one of the schools offering engineering

Anonymous wrote:If my kid gets accepted a magnet and we move to a high school that is in another region for 10th grade, can they go to the corresponding magnet program in the new region?
Anonymous wrote:Instead of reflexively getting angry about what your kid can't have, why don't you think about what would happen if every single MCPS high school was required to offer exactly the same classes?
There would be no specialization at all and fewer advanced courses, OP. Because no high school has the room to accommodate that many different classrooms. There is no money to pay for additions to all these buildings (and some don't have the room for additions anyway because they're squeezed in urban blocks). The budget isn't big enough to pay all the required teachers assigned to every school.
"If my kid can't have it, then no one can have it".
This is essentially what you're doing.
My kids are in college and high school, they won't see all that regional stuff. My oldest studied AP Latin at Walter Johnson, and as far as I know, it's the only MCPS high school that offers it - and it might not anymore, under the regional concept. My youngest attends a different high school that has IB, but since she's not in the IB programme, they don't have anything special. None of us in the family begrudge the fact that others have other opportunities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not a lawyer but I don’t think you have a case. Equity does not mean providing the exact same programs at every school. The school district is legally obligated to provide free access to a reasonable education approved by the state and it fulfills that requirement. As long as it is providing equivalent opportunities in each region, there is no basis to sue. Equivalent is different from identical. If only certain regions had access to specialized programming, then you could sue. But every region has specialized programs. You’re just not happy with the actual selection in your region. But it is impossible to satisfy every family in every region so the bar would be impossible to meet for MCPS
Then why not open up the access to these specialized programs the way they used to for Blair, Poolesville - have one upcounty and one down county school have it and 3 regions have access to each
Or make these specialized programs available to all in the county, make it criteria based like Richard Montgomery used to be.
Because they don’t want to spend the transportation money I think.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not a lawyer but I don’t think you have a case. Equity does not mean providing the exact same programs at every school. The school district is legally obligated to provide free access to a reasonable education approved by the state and it fulfills that requirement. As long as it is providing equivalent opportunities in each region, there is no basis to sue. Equivalent is different from identical. If only certain regions had access to specialized programming, then you could sue. But every region has specialized programs. You’re just not happy with the actual selection in your region. But it is impossible to satisfy every family in every region so the bar would be impossible to meet for MCPS
Then why not open up the access to these specialized programs the way they used to for Blair, Poolesville - have one upcounty and one down county school have it and 3 regions have access to each
Or make these specialized programs available to all in the county, make it criteria based like Richard Montgomery used to be.
Anonymous wrote:Wait but don't kids who want to learn a language only offered in like 1 school get a COSA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No
Why?
NP. Why would you have a case? What's the specific legal theory and under what authority would you sue? You generally can't use the courts to argue that an elected part of government isn't achieving their goals in the way you'd like.
That's the reason for this thread - are you a lawyer?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Instead of reflexively getting angry about what your kid can't have, why don't you think about what would happen if every single MCPS high school was required to offer exactly the same classes?
There would be no specialization at all and fewer advanced courses, OP. Because no high school has the room to accommodate that many different classrooms. There is no money to pay for additions to all these buildings (and some don't have the room for additions anyway because they're squeezed in urban blocks). The budget isn't big enough to pay all the required teachers assigned to every school.
"If my kid can't have it, then no one can have it".
This is essentially what you're doing.
My kids are in college and high school, they won't see all that regional stuff. My oldest studied AP Latin at Walter Johnson, and as far as I know, it's the only MCPS high school that offers it - and it might not anymore, under the regional concept. My youngest attends a different high school that has IB, but since she's not in the IB programme, they don't have anything special. None of us in the family begrudge the fact that others have other opportunities.
My argument is open up the access to these specialized programs to all in the county and make it criteria based