Anonymous wrote:The thing to keep in mind is any ABET accredited school is going to have the same baseline required classes and they are hard. Getting into a program is one thing. Staying in it is another.
Maybe one thing for your son to look into is an Engineering Technology degree. The classes are less abstract. More hands on. It’s not the same as an engineering degree and will lead to different job opportunities, but it may be a better fit
Anonymous wrote:WPI
Anonymous wrote:Northeastern
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is a "smart kid 3.0" but the opposite of your kid, OP. Solid test taker, disengaged student. Wants to go to Embry Riddle, which might be attainable. SAT scores will be well above average, GPA below average. I think he's an admissions officer's least favorite applicant.
I have a family member like this. He's the same as an adult. Doesn't work that hard at work but incredibly smart. Reads more than anyone I know and knows more about anything than anyone I know, but he doesn't use it to translate to real world success. He's ok with it, but I don't think his wife is!
lAnonymous wrote:Look at the medium-sized SUNY schools and the less selective SLACs, some of which have pre-engineering programs. SUNY Oswego and SUNY New Paltz, for example, both have engineering majors and are open to 3.0 students, but still offer real academics.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is a "smart kid 3.0" but the opposite of your kid, OP. Solid test taker, disengaged student. Wants to go to Embry Riddle, which might be attainable. SAT scores will be well above average, GPA below average. I think he's an admissions officer's least favorite applicant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm just wondering how a "smart" kid has a 3.0 and "bad" test scores. Just saying. Sounds like an average kid, not a smart one, which is just fine except average kids don't become engineers.
A 3.0 kid can still be a smart kid. Everyone has areas of expertise. The kid could have extensive knowledge in things that are not school course related - Movie buffs, Civil War Buffs, Historians, Geography, Pop culture nerds. They aren’t only taking classes on those subjects that they have specialized knowledge in.
Smart is subjective and doesn’t mean you know ever since thing known to man.
Sure buy c'mon. We're talking about engineering. None of the stuff you just mentioned has any relevance to that. But decent grades and test scores do. That's why I asked what "bad" test scores mean. If they're "DCUM bad" he probably has a 1400.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm just wondering how a "smart" kid has a 3.0 and "bad" test scores. Just saying. Sounds like an average kid, not a smart one, which is just fine except average kids don't become engineers.
A 3.0 kid can still be a smart kid. Everyone has areas of expertise. The kid could have extensive knowledge in things that are not school course related - Movie buffs, Civil War Buffs, Historians, Geography, Pop culture nerds. They aren’t only taking classes on those subjects that they have specialized knowledge in.
Smart is subjective and doesn’t mean you know ever since thing known to man.
Anonymous wrote:I'm just wondering how a "smart" kid has a 3.0 and "bad" test scores. Just saying. Sounds like an average kid, not a smart one, which is just fine except average kids don't become engineers.