Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parents on DCUM often fail to understand that class rank is the most important criteria. Grades and rigor obviously determine that, but can’t look at grades in isolation because of grade inflation. Second most important is quality of extracurriculars. Test scores matter, but much less than the other two.
Bullshit. The overwhelming majority of high schools don't even rank.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parents on DCUM often fail to understand that class rank is the most important criteria. Grades and rigor obviously determine that, but can’t look at grades in isolation because of grade inflation. Second most important is quality of extracurriculars. Test scores matter, but much less than the other two.
Bullshit. The overwhelming majority of high schools don't even rank.
Anonymous wrote:OP, where was your student accepted? Did you have targets? All top 20s are reaches for everyone. And no one can expect acceptance at an Ivy - it isn't realistic for absolutely anyone to assume it.
Re: UVA, was it engineering? If so, it is definitely that your child got compared to other TJ kids who were stronger.
Unfortunately, I think your expectations were too high for this day and age.
I don't agree with others that it is a mistake to go to TJ. The education the kids get is outstanding and definitely superior to any other school in FCPS by A LOT. But you have to make the college list carefully because you will be compared to your peers.
Anonymous wrote:Are TJ and Richard Montgomery comparable? RM’s exmissions are incredible, whereas I hear lots of complaints from TJ parents.
Anonymous wrote:We are still not able to comprehend that with a mid-year GPA from TJ 4.4X, SAT close to 1600, very good ECs, my child got rejected from all Ivies applied, waitlisted in a few T20 schools mostly private and UVA. We are trying to understand what went wrong. Really bothering us for the last couple of months how this can happen with this profile. Was GPA too low?. Did rigor matter at all?. They take the hardest courses but kids from other schools get into T20 schools with less grade or rigor.
Anonymous wrote:Parents on DCUM often fail to understand that class rank is the most important criteria. Grades and rigor obviously determine that, but can’t look at grades in isolation because of grade inflation. Second most important is quality of extracurriculars. Test scores matter, but much less than the other two.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's more than GPA imo.
But we are at a private HS. I see 3.8 uw getting into T10, but very spiky (non-STEM) with regional/national awards.
Agree. This is from the "best practices" post, and I agree with all 3 points - those are the kids who do well in this process.
In general, noticing the following kids are doing well with the schools listed in OP's post:
-kids with "juxtapositional depth". I heard this referenced in "The Game" podcast a while back, and indeed I'm seeing kids who went deep with EC's in two areas you might not expect for the same kid (art + sport, niche academic interest + mainstream school leadership like editor, student council president, etc.) are doing well.
-kids who are beloved by teachers (super kind, curious, helper-type kids, quiet leaders who love learning). Makes me wonder if LOR's are carrying more weight this year
-kids who spent a lot of time on apps and essays (revisions, being intentional with crafting essays for specific schools). Hate to say it, but the kids we know whose parents were very "hands off" with apps and who didn't have other coaching aren't doing as well.
Anonymous wrote:It's more than GPA imo.
But we are at a private HS. I see 3.8 uw getting into T10, but very spiky (non-STEM) with regional/national awards.