Anonymous wrote:Telework is not worth sacrificing my law license.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not a lawyer (nor do I play one on tv), but if you had your heart set on DOJ, wouldn't this be a good time to try to get in with competition being down? If you are able to stick it out for two more years, you are in for as long as you want?
People just blindly assume a Democrat will win in 2028, ignoring U.S. history before 2016 (12 years of Reagan/Bush, then 8 of Clinton, 8 of Bush, 8 of Obama). No one should join DOJ now who isn’t comfortable working for President Vance in the future.
Anonymous wrote:I am not a lawyer (nor do I play one on tv), but if you had your heart set on DOJ, wouldn't this be a good time to try to get in with competition being down? If you are able to stick it out for two more years, you are in for as long as you want?
Anonymous wrote:I am not a lawyer (nor do I play one on tv), but if you had your heart set on DOJ, wouldn't this be a good time to try to get in with competition being down? If you are able to stick it out for two more years, you are in for as long as you want?
Anonymous wrote:You can take the job and then sabotage the administration from within with crappy legal work. The people in charge are too dumb to realize you are submitting stupid stuff on purpose.
Anonymous wrote:OP is 100% correct in principle, though I think it would take more than two days per week to move the needle because people can get that in the private sector. I think it would need to be at least four days per week of telework. The more DOJ allows telework, the more they'll be able to attract qualified candidates. People may disagree with this president, but if you give them a well-paying job with lots of flexibility, they will look past policy disagreements.
Anonymous wrote:I am not a lawyer (nor do I play one on tv), but if you had your heart set on DOJ, wouldn't this be a good time to try to get in with competition being down? If you are able to stick it out for two more years, you are in for as long as you want?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:maybe a dumb question but does telework/WFH preference indicate party affiliation in current environment?
You can safely assume almost every employee everywhere wants some level of ability to TW regardless of party affiliation.
Right. Who wouldn’t?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:maybe a dumb question but does telework/WFH preference indicate party affiliation in current environment?
You can safely assume almost every employee everywhere wants some level of ability to TW regardless of party affiliation.
Anonymous wrote:Im at DOJ and the only bar for hiring attorneys is whether you are willing to defend this lawless administration. Most principled attorneys have left. They’re not trying to attract talent. You are right however that the lower pay should be compensated by more flexibility like telework
Anonymous wrote:maybe a dumb question but does telework/WFH preference indicate party affiliation in current environment?