Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are not top students. Average SAT is relatively low.
Also the physical test is not that hard that most of the average athlete should be able to pass.
You have no idea what you're talking about. The physical tests (plural!) are very challenging. For the Naval Academy last year, even recruits scoring in the top group of the physical tests weren't guaranteed admission.
I know one female who scored in the top 5% overall who was waitlisted and got in over the Summer. She was an excellent student and serious athlete who was in the top group for all the physical tests. The academies are elite.
They are not top students. Average SAT is relatively low.
Also the physical test is not that hard that most of the average athlete should be able to pass.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are not top students. Average SAT is relatively low.
Also the physical test is not that hard that most of the average athlete should be able to pass.
You have no idea what you're talking about. The physical tests (plural!) are very challenging. For the Naval Academy last year, even recruits scoring in the top group of the physical tests weren't guaranteed admission.
I know one female who scored in the top 5% overall who was waitlisted and got in over the Summer. She was an excellent student and serious athlete who was in the top group for all the physical tests. The academies are elite.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are not top students. Average SAT is relatively low.
Also the physical test is not that hard that most of the average athlete should be able to pass.
You have no idea what you're talking about. The physical tests (plural!) are very challenging. For the Naval Academy last year, even recruits scoring in the top group of the physical tests weren't guaranteed admission.
I know one female who scored in the top 5% overall who was waitlisted and got in over the Summer. She was an excellent student and serious athlete who was in the top group for all the physical tests. The academies are elite.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The military doesn't want the absolute smartest people. They want people good at following orders, not people who are Big Thinkers.
I am far more impressed with Service Academy grads than I am with Ivy grads. They are two very different types of people.
Anonymous wrote:They are not top students. Average SAT is relatively low.
Also the physical test is not that hard that most of the average athlete should be able to pass.
Anonymous wrote:The military doesn't want the absolute smartest people. They want people good at following orders, not people who are Big Thinkers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually, lots of the kids don‘t have the very best grades and scores. They need to be good, of course. Two people we know going this fall were fit but not fit enough to pass their physical testing and “failed” many times but its administered by someone like a gym teacher who can let them retake it. This is what they did, repeatedly.
I am this poster. No idea why people think it requires top test scores. See for yourself:
https://www.usna.edu/Admissions/_files/documents/ClassPortrait.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My experience to answer OP’s question is that successful applicants knew they wanted to do it around freshman/sophomore year and joined ROTC, cultivated a relationship with their congress person for the rec, etc.
You can’t just decide to lob in an apllication to a service academy.
Only exception to the above was recruited athlete at Navy who never really thought about it until talking with coaches junior year. For that kid, the process kind of works in reverse…you still need a nomination but the coach/staff make sure you get it easily.
+1. If you're a recruited athlete and stay out of trouble, they will make it happen for you. You may get referred to a military prep school for the first year if your academics are not up to par.
For everyone else, a lot depends on where you live and how competitive it is in your area. You have to secure a congressional nomination for 4/5 of the academies. In some districts, that is a challenge; in others, it may not be. Then, from that slate of nominations (10-15 names), you have to be top 1 or 2 (each congress person has around 5 spots at an academy at one time); if not, you are thrown into a national pool of applicants, and they see how you stack up from there. This is roughly how I think it works, anyway.
Anonymous wrote:My experience to answer OP’s question is that successful applicants knew they wanted to do it around freshman/sophomore year and joined ROTC, cultivated a relationship with their congress person for the rec, etc.
You can’t just decide to lob in an apllication to a service academy.
Only exception to the above was recruited athlete at Navy who never really thought about it until talking with coaches junior year. For that kid, the process kind of works in reverse…you still need a nomination but the coach/staff make sure you get it easily.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am 24 now, so I am too old. But I wish I knew about the service academies when I was young. It blows my mind so many people in them were top students and top athletes in school. Many people can’t even pass tryouts for JV sports teams here let alone be a varsity captain, and many top athletes aren’t great academically. I personally find it more impressive if someone goes to a service academy versus an Ivy League. How do people get into them? Are they just built differently?
You have to want to serve in the Military. If you do, it can be a great option.
Anonymous wrote:I am 24 now, so I am too old. But I wish I knew about the service academies when I was young. It blows my mind so many people in them were top students and top athletes in school. Many people can’t even pass tryouts for JV sports teams here let alone be a varsity captain, and many top athletes aren’t great academically. I personally find it more impressive if someone goes to a service academy versus an Ivy League. How do people get into them? Are they just built differently?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually, lots of the kids don‘t have the very best grades and scores. They need to be good, of course. Two people we know going this fall were fit but not fit enough to pass their physical testing and “failed” many times but its administered by someone like a gym teacher who can let them retake it. This is what they did, repeatedly.
I am this poster. No idea why people think it requires top test scores. See for yourself:
https://www.usna.edu/Admissions/_files/documents/ClassPortrait.pdf