Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know 3 women who had babies in the last month and none used a name like you describe. One is unusual, but it’s still a conventional spelling. It may be the demographics of who is in that particular group.
It's this. The poorer the mom, the dumber the name.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is just a casual thread. I’m in a pregnant moms group on Facebook, and a post popped up from someone asking what the moms in the group are planning to name their babies. I read out of curiosity, and 99% of the names (on a post with hundreds of comments) were absolutely outrageous. I’m talking Timber, Kollyns, Huntley, Bexlee, Hayzen, etc. Maybe it’s because I’m a FTM and am not around small children on a regular basis, but I feel like this mentality of needing to be unique is a relatively new phenomenon/trend. I’m starting to think my child is going to be the odd one out.
Those names are pretty trashy. I am never going to hire someone named Bexlee.
Anonymous wrote:This is just a casual thread. I’m in a pregnant moms group on Facebook, and a post popped up from someone asking what the moms in the group are planning to name their babies. I read out of curiosity, and 99% of the names (on a post with hundreds of comments) were absolutely outrageous. I’m talking Timber, Kollyns, Huntley, Bexlee, Hayzen, etc. Maybe it’s because I’m a FTM and am not around small children on a regular basis, but I feel like this mentality of needing to be unique is a relatively new phenomenon/trend. I’m starting to think my child is going to be the odd one out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes there are people obsessed with having a "unique" baby name. This is not a new trend. The people most likely to obsessively post about baby names online tend to fall into this trend.
But most kids get normal names. Go look at the top 100 names on the SSN site. It's stuff like Noah, Harrison, Violet, and Emma. This is the vast majority of kids.
There have always been people who have wanted to be different and special, but it was never as prevalent as it is today. Back in the day, most people didn’t care if their daughter was 1 of a million Jennifers or son was 1 of a million Christophers. I actually think conformity was more valued back then.
Anonymous wrote:Horseshoe theory of baby naming: the very trashy and the very wealthy converge on the unique baby names.
Anonymous wrote:We considered a more unique name for DS and worried his name would be too common. 18 years later I'm so glad we settled on Max. Short, sweet, and suits child and adult. And we've rarely encountered other Max's along the way in his age group.
Anonymous wrote:Yes there are people obsessed with having a "unique" baby name. This is not a new trend. The people most likely to obsessively post about baby names online tend to fall into this trend.
But most kids get normal names. Go look at the top 100 names on the SSN site. It's stuff like Noah, Harrison, Violet, and Emma. This is the vast majority of kids.
Anonymous wrote:I’m certain that I saw the exact post that you’re talking about, OP. Those names were atrocious. I was convinced half of the comments were from teen moms until I starting looking at their profile pictures and saw that they all looked 25+.
I almost spit out my drink when I saw comments saying JANSLER, TIMBERLYN, and KEMPER for baby girls.