Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for the reminder. Was happy to have the chance to provide my feedback on how disappointing the GT programming is in MCPS at the elementary level.
And it's been worse at the MS level, and under destruction at HS level. MCPS will soon be suck at every level.
Anonymous wrote:My question is why MCPS does G&T testing and does G&T designations and doesn't use that info in CES and HS magnet placement. Everything is just based on a single MAP-R or MAP-M data point. Seems like a not very robust way to identify smart kids, particularly young ones where you also have COGAT testing mandated by the state for G&T but MCPS doesn't use the information.
Anonymous wrote:I was shut out of the survey because the first question is “Do you have a hold receiving G&T services?” To my knowledge, my kid doesn’t but was labelled at G&T on numerous documents. Is Compacted Math considered a G&T “service”? This is a class, not a service.
Anonymous wrote:I was shut out of the survey because the first question is “Do you have a hold receiving G&T services?” To my knowledge, my kid doesn’t but was labelled at G&T on numerous documents. Is Compacted Math considered a G&T “service”? This is a class, not a service.
Anonymous wrote:My question is why MCPS does G&T testing and does G&T designations and doesn't use that info in CES and HS magnet placement. Everything is just based on a single MAP-R or MAP-M data point. Seems like a not very robust way to identify smart kids, particularly young ones where you also have COGAT testing mandated by the state for G&T but MCPS doesn't use the information.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are no gifted and talented programs at MCPS. All destroyed in the name of equity.
And that is OK
Anonymous wrote:Thanks for the reminder. Was happy to have the chance to provide my feedback on how disappointing the GT programming is in MCPS at the elementary level.