Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am glad they found this early.

Sounds like her prognosis is very good.

Wishing her the best outcome possible.

This is the only decent response to the news that someone has cancer.

At the same time, I think it's appropriate to note that the administration for which she works has made massive cuts to cancer research, including for breast cancer research, and has slowed advances in the prevention of breast cancer.

She praised Trump in her own social media post announcing her diagnosis. She is a sycophant like the rest of his administration.

Anonymous wrote:I am glad they found this early.

Sounds like her prognosis is very good.

Wishing her the best outcome possible.

This is the only decent response to the news that someone has cancer.

At the same time, I think it's appropriate to note that the administration for which she works has made massive cuts to cancer research, including for breast cancer research, and has slowed advances in the prevention of breast cancer.

I am glad they found this early.

Sounds like her prognosis is very good.

Wishing her the best outcome possible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe RFK Jr shouldn't have cancelled 87 breast cancer studies.

Maybe we shouldn't be spending 17 cents of every dollar spent in this country on health care. Highest by percentage in the world.

Research is a drop in the bucket of that spending. The public portion of the research spending is a few cents of every healthcare dollar. Canceling research studies is not going to fix our healthcare problem. Not even close.

To you, everything is a drop in the bucket to justify more and more gubmint spending.

Says the person whose madman-in-Chief is spending ... how much will it be??? ... on a war that will accomplish nothing except for radicalizing a new generation of anti-Americans and make our last remaining allies, if you can call them that anymore, hate us.

Anonymous wrote:She doesn’t moderate him. She just tidies up a little while he isn’t looking.

Take the HHS stuff. She installed some random healthcare CEO to run the department and forced RFK to go campaigning because the vaccine stuff is hemorrhaging voters. But it’s only because Trump is preoccupied. If his majesty decides he suddenly wants to announce another fake cause of autism, she’s not going to stop him.

This. This g she has to pull back or vacate her job, Miller will step and yes, it will be 10x worse but let him push things over the edge. Things have to get worse before they get better. It’ll be worse than we could ever imagine but it may have to happen. That’s what will wake up more voters. He’s going to piss off the wrong MAGAs.

She doesn’t moderate him. She just tidies up a little while he isn’t looking.

Take the HHS stuff. She installed some random healthcare CEO to run the department and forced RFK to go campaigning because the vaccine stuff is hemorrhaging voters. But it’s only because Trump is preoccupied. If his majesty decides he suddenly wants to announce another fake cause of autism, she’s not going to stop him.

Anonymous wrote:She is NOT a moderating influence.
She has openly stated that her job is to enable Trump, not act as checks and balances. That’s why she still has her job.

This. It was in the Vanity Fair article with the big photo spread a few months back.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe RFK Jr shouldn't have cancelled 87 breast cancer studies.

Maybe we shouldn't be spending 17 cents of every dollar spent in this country on health care. Highest by percentage in the world.

Research is a drop in the bucket of that spending. The public portion of the research spending is a few cents of every healthcare dollar. Canceling research studies is not going to fix our healthcare problem. Not even close.

To you, everything is a drop in the bucket to justify more and more gubmint spending.

It has nothing to do with me. Look up where all the healthcare spending goes for yourself if you don't want to read it here. If you don't want to take advantage of any modern medicine and the research that leads to it in your life, go ahead. die in your '60s if you want want to just like back when America was great.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe RFK Jr shouldn't have cancelled 87 breast cancer studies.

Maybe we shouldn't be spending 17 cents of every dollar spent in this country on health care. Highest by percentage in the world.

Research is a drop in the bucket of that spending. The public portion of the research spending is a few cents of every healthcare dollar. Canceling research studies is not going to fix our healthcare problem. Not even close.

To you, everything is a drop in the bucket to justify more and more gubmint spending.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe RFK Jr shouldn't have cancelled 87 breast cancer studies.

Maybe we shouldn't be spending 17 cents of every dollar spent in this country on health care. Highest by percentage in the world.

Research is a drop in the bucket of that spending. The public portion of the research spending is a few cents of every healthcare dollar. Canceling research studies is not going to fix our healthcare problem. Not even close.

Anonymous wrote:Maybe RFK Jr shouldn't have cancelled 87 breast cancer studies.

Maybe we shouldn't be spending 17 cents of every dollar spent in this country on health care. Highest by percentage in the world.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, no. She’s evil and complicit and cancer doesn’t change that one iota.

+1 We learned this in the giant Vanity Fair article.

She’s a liar with crazy eyes.
She said Vance was/is a conspiracy theorist, but nonetheless would support him in 2028.
Also said she and Trump knew nothing about Maxwell’s transfer.

Vanity Fair interviewer AMA (Chris Whipple) “When the White House uses words like ‘context’ or ‘disingenuous,’ you know you're on the right track as a journalist. It means that they're not disputing the evidence or the accuracy of the piece. And that's because they know that the story is rock solid.”

“The way she talked about Trump and Epstein was remarkable. She seemed a little embarrassed when she used the word ‘playboys’ to describe them, saying that she knew the word was "passé."

There’s much more.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People often think a woman is a moderating influence.

Melania…
Ivanka…

None really were.

Disagree. Hellscape 1.0 seemed not nearly as bad as Hellscape 2.0. I think that is due in part to JaVanka.

No, it’s because of everyone else, besides Javanka, almost all of whom were qualified for their positions and not just clown show wearing bootlickers.

+1 Kelly, Millie, Mnuchin - there were a lot of legit people who weren't really recognized that way at the time

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People often think a woman is a moderating influence.

Melania…
Ivanka…

None really were.

Disagree. Hellscape 1.0 seemed not nearly as bad as Hellscape 2.0. I think that is due in part to JaVanka.

No, it’s because of everyone else, besides Javanka, almost all of whom were qualified for their positions and not just clown show wearing bootlickers.

Maybe RFK Jr shouldn't have cancelled 87 breast cancer studies.