Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SMH
+1
"harvesting" lol
Lots of dumb people on here.
OP, our wealth manager does regular tax loss harvesting with many trades over the year. That said, he recently presented another vehicle for a more sophisticated approach. The company is Quantinno and their focus is tax harvesting using long and short sales. The catch is that Quantinno management fees would be on top of our existing fees to our wealth manager, which is why we haven't made the leap. We currently pay .05% for assets under management, and the Quantinno funds would cost another .045% on top of that, bringing us to almost 1% in management fees. Not sure it is worth it, but we are HNW family and apparently the tax lost harvesting loses its strength over time, whereas the long/short approach gives you more options. I'm not financially saavy, so bare with this explanation.
What’s your NW? We’re technically in the HNW bucket (lower end) and what we’ve been told is these vehicles make sense when you’re $10M+ investable assets. Anything below you’re over complicating it.
It's useless in a normal year. It's helpful if you have to cash out for a big purchase and want to generate losses to offset it.
If you are a good investor you don't have losses to harvest. Profits > taxes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SMH
+1
"harvesting" lol
Lots of dumb people on here.
OP, our wealth manager does regular tax loss harvesting with many trades over the year. That said, he recently presented another vehicle for a more sophisticated approach. The company is Quantinno and their focus is tax harvesting using long and short sales. The catch is that Quantinno management fees would be on top of our existing fees to our wealth manager, which is why we haven't made the leap. We currently pay .05% for assets under management, and the Quantinno funds would cost another .045% on top of that, bringing us to almost 1% in management fees. Not sure it is worth it, but we are HNW family and apparently the tax lost harvesting loses its strength over time, whereas the long/short approach gives you more options. I'm not financially saavy, so bare with this explanation.
What’s your NW? We’re technically in the HNW bucket (lower end) and what we’ve been told is these vehicles make sense when you’re $10M+ investable assets. Anything below you’re over complicating it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SMH
+1
"harvesting" lol
Lots of dumb people on here.
OP, our wealth manager does regular tax loss harvesting with many trades over the year. That said, he recently presented another vehicle for a more sophisticated approach. The company is Quantinno and their focus is tax harvesting using long and short sales. The catch is that Quantinno management fees would be on top of our existing fees to our wealth manager, which is why we haven't made the leap. We currently pay .05% for assets under management, and the Quantinno funds would cost another .045% on top of that, bringing us to almost 1% in management fees. Not sure it is worth it, but we are HNW family and apparently the tax lost harvesting loses its strength over time, whereas the long/short approach gives you more options. I'm not financially saavy, so bare with this explanation.
What’s your NW? We’re technically in the HNW bucket (lower end) and what we’ve been told is these vehicles make sense when you’re $10M+ investable assets. Anything below you’re over complicating it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SMH
+1
"harvesting" lol
Lots of dumb people on here.
OP, our wealth manager does regular tax loss harvesting with many trades over the year. That said, he recently presented another vehicle for a more sophisticated approach. The company is Quantinno and their focus is tax harvesting using long and short sales. The catch is that Quantinno management fees would be on top of our existing fees to our wealth manager, which is why we haven't made the leap. We currently pay .05% for assets under management, and the Quantinno funds would cost another .045% on top of that, bringing us to almost 1% in management fees. Not sure it is worth it, but we are HNW family and apparently the tax lost harvesting loses its strength over time, whereas the long/short approach gives you more options. I'm not financially saavy, so bare with this explanation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SMH
+1
"harvesting" lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have a wealth management group they work with to do this? Not interested in debating the practice itself - just looking for a referral
Of course you aren't, lol.
Careful. People do go to prison ...
Tell me you don’t know what you’re talking about without telling me you don’t know what you’re talking about…
Lol. Ok.
OP, if you aren't afraid of prison (which I can understand why you wouldn't be, IRS CID doesn't always do the job they should with this stuff, and even when they do, DOJ Tax doesn't always green light the pros) add up the potential interest and penalties you can get hit with when transactions are found to lack economic substance. Do that math.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have a wealth management group they work with to do this? Not interested in debating the practice itself - just looking for a referral
Of course you aren't, lol.
Careful. People do go to prison ...
Anonymous wrote:SMH
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have a wealth management group they work with to do this? Not interested in debating the practice itself - just looking for a referral
Of course you aren't, lol.
Careful. People do go to prison ...
Tell me you don’t know what you’re talking about without telling me you don’t know what you’re talking about…