Anonymous wrote:its popular with female doctors, 3rd one cost me so much of my health...
Anonymous wrote:I think so many millennials were disappointed with their small families of origin. My parents only had 1 and dhs only had 2. Our parents came from large families and we had dozens of cousins, but our kids won’t ever have any cousins.
We had 3 because it gives us that big family feeling but is still low enough that we can spend a lot of time with each.
Anonymous wrote:I'd say maybe 15% of my friends (older Millenial) have 3 or more kids. Most are very religious.
Anonymous wrote:I think so many millennials were disappointed with their small families of origin. My parents only had 1 and dhs only had 2. Our parents came from large families and we had dozens of cousins, but our kids won’t ever have any cousins.
We had 3 because it gives us that big family feeling but is still low enough that we can spend a lot of time with each.
Anonymous wrote:I think having only two kids of the same gender is becoming less common. It's either boy-girl sib set or three plus, and yeah, probably because it's more acceptable now to have a baby at 40+.
Anonymous wrote:I have friends with everything from 1-5 kids.
I feel like growing up as a family of four, we weren't that rare in the 90s and birth rate stats back up my anecdote that only children are more common and 4 kids like my family are much rarer.
And huge contrast from my parents. My mom and Dad both come from very large families (over 7 kids) and in the 50s, particularly in Catholic circles, that wasn't terribly rare.
Anonymous wrote:its popular with female doctors, 3rd one cost me so much of my health...
Anonymous wrote:I swear a few years ago two seemed like the “standard,” and now I keep seeing baby #3 announcements everywhere. Is this actually a trend, or am I just at the age where everyone’s hitting that stage at the same time?
Anonymous wrote:I swear a few years ago two seemed like the “standard,” and now I keep seeing baby #3 announcements everywhere. Is this actually a trend, or am I just at the age where everyone’s hitting that stage at the same time?
Anonymous wrote:I think with it being more socially acceptable to have a baby at 40+, a lot of couples are going for a 3rd at an older age. Whereas even 10 years ago that would have been considered quite unusual. I know couples who had a 2nd baby at 40/41 10-12 years ago, where the first baby was born when mom was 38/39, but it seemed like you always stopped at 2 if that was the case.
Interestingly, the couples I know with 3 or even 4 kids generally have two working parents as opposed to a SAHP, and they also have lots of local family help. My SAHM friends all stopped at 2!