Anonymous wrote:Why does anyone care which acquisitions are made by any companies? If you're a stockholder in one of them, you would of course hope the deals will support your initial investment thesis, but otherwise, so what? You don't have to invest in or patronize any of the companies involved. Angst over business activity irrelevant to you is quite bizarre.
Anonymous wrote:Once the White House is democrat again, I hope they will break up the New Murdochs for illegal media monopoly, and prosecute the original Murdochs for spreading disinformation on Fox.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No longer are anti-trust laws the major hurdle to clear in pushing large acquisitions across the finish line - in this new paradigm, you apparently have to secure permission from the White House.
The founding fathers are surely chuckling somewhere at the mess we’ve all allowed to consume our nation.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/warner-bros-discovery-paramounts-offer-superior-to-netflix-1236516591/
If the deal is no longer profitable then one must concede that Paramount taking over a media, news, and cultural powerhouse is about something else. CBS makes it look obvious.
Netflix already had a deal. How is this even a thing in business where the WBD board keeps saying no for months to Paramount until it's forced to say yes? This is not how business deals work. It's how the yakuza or cartels force their way on and infiltrate the boards of large corporations in their respective countries.
This needs to be investigated and the next president surely will, on anti-trust alone. Hopefully the next president has some balls (male or females) and tears all this shit down. No dual loyalties.
The zionists are taking over. Look to alternative sources for your news. And no this is not anti-semitic, whatever that means anyway. Zionists are saying the quiet part out loud these days.
Loon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No longer are anti-trust laws the major hurdle to clear in pushing large acquisitions across the finish line - in this new paradigm, you apparently have to secure permission from the White House.
The founding fathers are surely chuckling somewhere at the mess we’ve all allowed to consume our nation.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/warner-bros-discovery-paramounts-offer-superior-to-netflix-1236516591/
If the deal is no longer profitable then one must concede that Paramount taking over a media, news, and cultural powerhouse is about something else. CBS makes it look obvious.
Netflix already had a deal. How is this even a thing in business where the WBD board keeps saying no for months to Paramount until it's forced to say yes? This is not how business deals work. It's how the yakuza or cartels force their way on and infiltrate the boards of large corporations in their respective countries.
This needs to be investigated and the next president surely will, on anti-trust alone. Hopefully the next president has some balls (male or females) and tears all this shit down. No dual loyalties.
The zionists are taking over. Look to alternative sources for your news. And no this is not anti-semitic, whatever that means anyway. Zionists are saying the quiet part out loud these days.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Once the White House is democrat again, I hope they will break up the New Murdochs for illegal media monopoly, and prosecute the original Murdochs for spreading disinformation on Fox.
Democrats won’t do a damn thing. They always seem to find an excuse to do nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Once the White House is democrat again, I hope they will break up the New Murdochs for illegal media monopoly, and prosecute the original Murdochs for spreading disinformation on Fox.