Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does this make sense? If you present as a female, but were born a male, and you get a new license that identifies you as a male, won’t that visual disconnect be confusing for anyone who has to check the ID? They might think it’s a fake.

Then point is to make life miserable for those people by adding just one more awkward interaction for them to have on a regular basis. Somehow, that will make trans people go away.

So this is all about not making people feel awkward?

What public safety purpose does it serve?

It’s recognizing reality and biological fact. You’re assuming these people actually look like someone of the opposite gender.

What does appearance have to do with the ability to operate a motor vehicle?
Second--many do, if they have been lucky enough to access quality gender affirming care. Some of the military trans people who have sued the feds are absolutely indistinguishable from a good looking catalogue--both male and female. And if fact if some of those trans people identified as female at birth strolled into a ladies room someone would be calling the cops--a conundrum nobody has ever given an answer for.

As for the use of drivers licenses for identity, how does gender matter? You have a name, a birthdate, a number, and a photo. You see if the photo appears to be of the same person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does this make sense? If you present as a female, but were born a male, and you get a new license that identifies you as a male, won’t that visual disconnect be confusing for anyone who has to check the ID? They might think it’s a fake.

Then point is to make life miserable for those people by adding just one more awkward interaction for them to have on a regular basis. Somehow, that will make trans people go away.

So this is all about not making people feel awkward?

What public safety purpose does it serve?

It’s recognizing reality and biological fact. You’re assuming these people actually look like someone of the opposite gender.

You didn’t answer the question. What functional purpose does this serve? Whose life is improved by this?

Everyone in Kansas’s life in some small way. Because their government has stopped this bit of fraud.

Anonymous wrote:Oh god- I hope the FBI. Is paying close attention. We all know what happens next.

don't forget Tulsi because identity is now a national intelligence issue

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does this make sense? If you present as a female, but were born a male, and you get a new license that identifies you as a male, won’t that visual disconnect be confusing for anyone who has to check the ID? They might think it’s a fake.

Then point is to make life miserable for those people by adding just one more awkward interaction for them to have on a regular basis. Somehow, that will make trans people go away.

So this is all about not making people feel awkward?

What public safety purpose does it serve?

It’s recognizing reality and biological fact. You’re assuming these people actually look like someone of the opposite gender.

You didn’t answer the question. What functional purpose does this serve? Whose life is improved by this?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like a Republican in NY or CA, their votes don’t make much difference.

If only. Don't forget that New York Republicans are responsible for the election of that of that idiot crook George Santos. And for the fool that commuted his sentence.

DP. Should we review all the idiot Democrats NY has elected? There’s a long list.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does this make sense? If you present as a female, but were born a male, and you get a new license that identifies you as a male, won’t that visual disconnect be confusing for anyone who has to check the ID? They might think it’s a fake.

Then point is to make life miserable for those people by adding just one more awkward interaction for them to have on a regular basis. Somehow, that will make trans people go away.

So this is all about not making people feel awkward?

What public safety purpose does it serve?

It’s recognizing reality and biological fact. You’re assuming these people actually look like someone of the opposite gender.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does this make sense? If you present as a female, but were born a male, and you get a new license that identifies you as a male, won’t that visual disconnect be confusing for anyone who has to check the ID? They might think it’s a fake.

Then point is to make life miserable for those people by adding just one more awkward interaction for them to have on a regular basis. Somehow, that will make trans people go away.

So this is all about not making people feel awkward?

What public safety purpose does it serve?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does this make sense? If you present as a female, but were born a male, and you get a new license that identifies you as a male, won’t that visual disconnect be confusing for anyone who has to check the ID? They might think it’s a fake.

Then point is to make life miserable for those people by adding just one more awkward interaction for them to have on a regular basis. Somehow, that will make trans people go away.

So this is all about not making people feel awkward?

Anonymous wrote:How does this make sense? If you present as a female, but were born a male, and you get a new license that identifies you as a male, won’t that visual disconnect be confusing for anyone who has to check the ID? They might think it’s a fake.

Then point is to make life miserable for those people by adding just one more awkward interaction for them to have on a regular basis. Somehow, that will make trans people go away.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep in mind that driving is a privilege, not a right. The state can confiscate your license at any time.

Then let's take away YOUR license, fool, for no good reason.

Kansas believes it's a good reason. It's a crime to lie on government documents.

If it were a crime, there would have been no need to pass this new law.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep in mind that driving is a privilege, not a right. The state can confiscate your license at any time.

Then let's take away YOUR license, fool, for no good reason.

Kansas believes it's a good reason. It's a crime to lie on government documents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep in mind that driving is a privilege, not a right. The state can confiscate your license at any time.

Not really. Strange thing about state granted privileges. Once you have them, they cannot be arbitrarily or capriciously revoked. There is a due process element at play.

Not true at all.

How quickly is a lawsuit going to be filed?

Anonymous wrote:Keep in mind that driving is a privilege, not a right. The state can confiscate your license at any time.

Then let's take away YOUR license, fool, for no good reason.

Anonymous wrote:Driver’s licenses indicate one’s sex, not gender. If someone puts the gender they identify as on their DL, and it doesn’t correspond to their sex, that’s fraud.

This is true and also, there is no lW against cross-dressing. If a biological male wants to present as female or vice versa, they can do so without fear of being in trouble if pulled over looking like a woman while their driver's license indicates they are male. I've actually lived this circumstance myself and the officer had nothing to say about my gender or sex.