Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a Van Cleef alhambra necklace and a Cartier love bracelet. I love and wear both. They don't feel necessarily trendy to me because I don't see them in the wild very often. I think social media has skewed our sense of what's overdone/saturated.
That said, I find stacks of Cartier bracelets to be impossibly tacky.
Really? I feel like I see almost nothing but.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They used to be a symbol of conventional, westernized wealth.
Not anymore, since now there are so many credible fakes.
This -- I also have no desire for a Hermes or Chanel bag at this point since there are just so many people with fakes.
So, you don't really like those bags. Your primary concern would be that it be accepted as a sign of wealth. Ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They used to be a symbol of conventional, westernized wealth.
Not anymore, since now there are so many credible fakes.
This -- I also have no desire for a Hermes or Chanel bag at this point since there are just so many people with fakes.
Anonymous wrote:I have a Van Cleef alhambra necklace and a Cartier love bracelet. I love and wear both. They don't feel necessarily trendy to me because I don't see them in the wild very often. I think social media has skewed our sense of what's overdone/saturated.
That said, I find stacks of Cartier bracelets to be impossibly tacky.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They used to be a symbol of conventional, westernized wealth.
Not anymore, since now there are so many credible fakes.
This -- I also have no desire for a Hermes or Chanel bag at this point since there are just so many people with fakes.
Anonymous wrote:Welp nobody ever thinks my stack of DY is fake
Anonymous wrote:Not all replicas are cheap. You can get replicas that are real gold, and have beautiful workmanship, custom made by jewelers.
Anonymous wrote:I think that they have nice but very basic style and value things that are both beautiful and highly recognizable. They value wealth signifiers. As far as actual style goes, when we talk about whether or not someone is a "stylish" person -- an Alhambra bracelet, a Love bracelet ... these things convey a certain kind and level of style that is not bad and not great. It's nice. It's fine. It's basic. I wouldn't mind an Alhambra bracelet in tiger eye (because tiger eye is special to me). But I wouldn't go out of my way to buy it. And I wouldn't be in "head to toe" signifiers, but that is because I tend to prefer more of a street style.
Anonymous wrote:I have a Van Cleef alhambra necklace and a Cartier love bracelet. I love and wear both. They don't feel necessarily trendy to me because I don't see them in the wild very often. I think social media has skewed our sense of what's overdone/saturated.
That said, I find stacks of Cartier bracelets to be impossibly tacky.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe it's fake, maybe it's not. Does it matter? Wear what you like, buy what you can afford. If it bothers you that someone might think your $12,000 VCA piece is just a cheap Temu imitation, then I don't know how to help you.
Anonymous wrote:The love bracelets are beautiful. My MIL gifts them to all her granddaughters so my DD has a few which she likes to wear stacked. I don’t have any opinion about what others choose to wear.
Anonymous wrote:
They used to be a symbol of conventional, westernized wealth.
Not anymore, since now there are so many credible fakes.
Anonymous wrote:
They used to be a symbol of conventional, westernized wealth.
Not anymore, since now there are so many credible fakes.