Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
OP, is this realization just now hitting you lol? I had this convo with my colleagues 5 years ago.
I work in big tech and have no concerns about my kids. DH and I need to be able to hold on for 10 years to retire, I am nervous about that.
My kids are young but all interested in blue collar jobs that exist in the real world, not just the digital world. They will be fine.
I call absolute bs that you were having this conversation 5 years ago. 5 years ago AI as we know it categorically did not exist. The only thing that existed 5 years ago was suggested sentence finishers and vague language interpretation, things like BERT. Also call bs on your 'young kids who are interested in blue collar jobs'. Your 5 year old wanting to be a fireman is not a solution for this moment dude. If in fact you were high enough up the food chain in tech and smart enough to truly know this was coming 5 years ago, then your net worth should be high enough you dont both need to work for another decade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll believe it when I see it.
AI still hallucinates like crazy and needs a lot of prompt engineering and training to do anything useful.
The notion that AI can replace “the vast majority of what we do in white collar jobs” is kind of laughable.
Yes, it will replace some things.
But it is very unlikely to replace the “vast majority” of people.
You're wrong. Google anything about this and read. This is a real thing that is happening.
Ok, let’s take one example.
Explain to me how AI will replace lawyers.
I’m not talking about AI being incorporated into legal workflows.
I mean a world in which we have no lawyers because AI is doing all legal work.
Will an AI agent represent a client in court?
What about doctors? Professors?
Will kids enter a classroom and be taught by an AI agent?
Anonymous wrote:We’re about to hit a Tsnami of old people. Will AI care for them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's true that AI still isn't great, but so many white collar tech jobs don't need great AI. It's scary to think about if you work in the high tech industry. And what does it spell for the future of our economy if so many middle class and upper middle class jobs are suddenly gone? The US will have 75 multi-billionaires and everyone else will be out on their ass. This feels so reminiscent of when US got rid of all the manufacturing jobs. Those jobs were not replaced by better options for the most part, and we just saw the decline of so much of the country.
Who do these companies think will buy their products or provide a valid market for the ads they sell if nobody has a job. They need to think like Henry Ford who paid his workers well so that they could afford to buy his cars (and improved productivity, loyalty, etc).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll believe it when I see it.
AI still hallucinates like crazy and needs a lot of prompt engineering and training to do anything useful.
The notion that AI can replace “the vast majority of what we do in white collar jobs” is kind of laughable.
Yes, it will replace some things.
But it is very unlikely to replace the “vast majority” of people.
You're wrong. Google anything about this and read. This is a real thing that is happening.
Anonymous wrote:It's true that AI still isn't great, but so many white collar tech jobs don't need great AI. It's scary to think about if you work in the high tech industry. And what does it spell for the future of our economy if so many middle class and upper middle class jobs are suddenly gone? The US will have 75 multi-billionaires and everyone else will be out on their ass. This feels so reminiscent of when US got rid of all the manufacturing jobs. Those jobs were not replaced by better options for the most part, and we just saw the decline of so much of the country.
Anonymous wrote:I’ll believe it when I see it.
AI still hallucinates like crazy and needs a lot of prompt engineering and training to do anything useful.
The notion that AI can replace “the vast majority of what we do in white collar jobs” is kind of laughable.
Yes, it will replace some things.
But it is very unlikely to replace the “vast majority” of people.
Anonymous wrote:Childcare workers to help children socialize with each other. As long as people producing babies, need for some level of child care. Or doggie care if people no longer want humans.
Adopt a kid, there are countless family-less kids.
Plant a garden
Anonymous wrote:I work in law and AI is constantly hallucinating things. How is this going to replace anyone at all?
Anonymous wrote:Not just big tech. I don’t understand what jobs and fields will be open to our kids. I still think writing and thinking are important, but many people seem to think AI can do that for us.