Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fasick (AP) is moving from Madison. Walker (AP) is moving from Fairfax. West Springfield field is losing its Director of Student Services, Basta. Woodson is losing its Director of Student Activities, Smith.
Bummer
FCPS really has a target on WSHS. They keep pillaging their staff
The staff applied for the positions.
Exactly. The PP should be asking themselves why everyone wants to leave WSHS, not blaming FCPS for giving them other opportunities.
Why would you say everyone wants to leave WSHS? I can see wanting to leave Madison, but not WS. Maybe the positions are closer to the new administrators’ homes, and you get promoted to principal or above within FCPS by working in different environments.
There is not a target on WSHS staff, the staff their keep applying for jobs to leave WSHS, therefor FCPS isn't going in and removing people unwillingly from WSHS. People are applying for jobs elsewhere.
However, it certainly doesn't mean people are wanting to leave. If they're leaving for better opportunities that's incredibly logical and wise for their careers. If they're leaving for later or even lower jobs elsewhere (outside of a better commute, work/life balance etc) then you'd wonder if WSHS has issues.
WSHS lost people to TJ when Mukai moved over. That’s not surprising and is not a reflection on the school. Being a charter staff member at a new school is an exciting opportunity for many people. It may pay the same, but you get to build the ship from the ground up, which excites a lot of career educators.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fasick (AP) is moving from Madison. Walker (AP) is moving from Fairfax. West Springfield field is losing its Director of Student Services, Basta. Woodson is losing its Director of Student Activities, Smith.
Bummer
FCPS really has a target on WSHS. They keep pillaging their staff
The staff applied for the positions.
Exactly. The PP should be asking themselves why everyone wants to leave WSHS, not blaming FCPS for giving them other opportunities.
Why would you say everyone wants to leave WSHS? I can see wanting to leave Madison, but not WS. Maybe the positions are closer to the new administrators’ homes, and you get promoted to principal or above within FCPS by working in different environments.
There is not a target on WSHS staff, the staff their keep applying for jobs to leave WSHS, therefor FCPS isn't going in and removing people unwillingly from WSHS. People are applying for jobs elsewhere.
However, it certainly doesn't mean people are wanting to leave. If they're leaving for better opportunities that's incredibly logical and wise for their careers. If they're leaving for later or even lower jobs elsewhere (outside of a better commute, work/life balance etc) then you'd wonder if WSHS has issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why did Principal leave region job? seems like a downgrade?
I thought that regional principals are a fail up category of jobs, a place where fcps puts principals like the hayfield football principal.
Sometimes but not always. Sometimes they are rewards for principals who’ve done well at their schools but are ready for a quieter desk job and can mentor other principals. Penny Gros at Justice and Jay Pierson at Marshall, who became executive principals, fit that description. On the other hand, there have also been some really bad principals who ended up in even more senior Gatehouse roles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why did Principal leave region job? seems like a downgrade?
I think that opening a new school is a different challenge and I doubt anyone would see it as a downgrade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why did Principal leave region job? seems like a downgrade?
I thought that regional principals are a fail up category of jobs, a place where fcps puts principals like the hayfield football principal.
Anonymous wrote:why did Principal leave region job? seems like a downgrade?
Anonymous wrote:why did Principal leave region job? seems like a downgrade?
Anonymous wrote:They have discussed the pathways every since the school was settled. It started as an aviation academy, which was rejected, and then moved into these pathways. They are the same concept as the pathways at Chantilly. This is not new information or a new concept. There will be some specific electives kids can take as part of a specific pathway.
Anonymous wrote:They have discussed the pathways every since the school was settled. It started as an aviation academy, which was rejected, and then moved into these pathways. They are the same concept as the pathways at Chantilly. This is not new information or a new concept. There will be some specific electives kids can take as part of a specific pathway.
Anonymous wrote:Potential academic pathways reads like an aviation and tech magnet school to me. Not even trying to hide it anymore. But hey the board voted for a traditional high school.![]()