Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:my DC is being recruited by both of these schools for their sport. Two wildly different schools, I know I knowbut top academics certainly at both, and DC really likes coach/team at both. And yes the athletic part is important - but it seems to be a wash. So which school wins out based on the “broken leg test” - if DC decides or can’t compete on the team at some point. They will be an econ major and don’t have a direction in terms of career interest, other than vaguely “finance” or “consulting”, which they know very little about
![]()
any thoughts? pros cons?
Econ, Consulting, Finance.....Williams all the way if IB, MBB might be in the future. The top NESCAC schools for IB (Williams, Middlebury, Amherst) place extremely well into these areas while JHU is a low-semi target and not as present in the industry.
These career paths have no future in the AI era. Dead end. Let me repeat. DEAD END.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both are excellent schools. See what he thinks after the official visits and offers.
Huge difference for an athlete Econ major. iYKYK.
I get it. Some schools being an athlete leads to much better career outcomes than others, especially for finance, econ etc. Williams is one of them.
My kid talked to them but needed a big athletic scholarship and Williams as a D3 doesn't offer them.
100%. Williams is the winner here - provided the kid is social and will mix well with that jock-finance crowd.
OP here - don’t want to name the sport, but it’s not lacrosse or football - and he’s not the heavy partying type and would worry that the Williams pipeline to the street is mostly for the bro brah helmet sport kids?
Right. And what happens to the non-athlete Econ bros?
much much different outcomes - the majority of Williams alumns on the street are jocks. And not tennis players or cross country runners
Anonymous wrote:You’re fine if it’s tennis or golf. Great connections.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both are excellent schools. See what he thinks after the official visits and offers.
Huge difference for an athlete Econ major. iYKYK.
I get it. Some schools being an athlete leads to much better career outcomes than others, especially for finance, econ etc. Williams is one of them.
My kid talked to them but needed a big athletic scholarship and Williams as a D3 doesn't offer them.
100%. Williams is the winner here - provided the kid is social and will mix well with that jock-finance crowd.
OP here - don’t want to name the sport, but it’s not lacrosse or football - and he’s not the heavy partying type and would worry that the Williams pipeline to the street is mostly for the bro brah helmet sport kids?
Right. And what happens to the non-athlete Econ bros?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both are excellent schools. See what he thinks after the official visits and offers.
Huge difference for an athlete Econ major. iYKYK.
I get it. Some schools being an athlete leads to much better career outcomes than others, especially for finance, econ etc. Williams is one of them.
My kid talked to them but needed a big athletic scholarship and Williams as a D3 doesn't offer them.
100%. Williams is the winner here - provided the kid is social and will mix well with that jock-finance crowd.
OP here - don’t want to name the sport, but it’s not lacrosse or football - and he’s not the heavy partying type and would worry that the Williams pipeline to the street is mostly for the bro brah helmet sport kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both are excellent schools. See what he thinks after the official visits and offers.
Huge difference for an athlete Econ major. iYKYK.
I get it. Some schools being an athlete leads to much better career outcomes than others, especially for finance, econ etc. Williams is one of them.
My kid talked to them but needed a big athletic scholarship and Williams as a D3 doesn't offer them.
100%. Williams is the winner here - provided the kid is social and will mix well with that jock-finance crowd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both are excellent schools. See what he thinks after the official visits and offers.
Huge difference for an athlete Econ major. iYKYK.
I get it. Some schools being an athlete leads to much better career outcomes than others, especially for finance, econ etc. Williams is one of them.
My kid talked to them but needed a big athletic scholarship and Williams as a D3 doesn't offer them.
100%. Williams is the winner here - provided the kid is social and will mix well with that jock-finance crowd.
Anonymous wrote:Lots of Hopkins athletes in the finance world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:my DC is being recruited by both of these schools for their sport. Two wildly different schools, I know I knowbut top academics certainly at both, and DC really likes coach/team at both. And yes the athletic part is important - but it seems to be a wash. So which school wins out based on the “broken leg test” - if DC decides or can’t compete on the team at some point. They will be an econ major and don’t have a direction in terms of career interest, other than vaguely “finance” or “consulting”, which they know very little about
![]()
any thoughts? pros cons?
Econ, Consulting, Finance.....Williams all the way if IB, MBB might be in the future. The top NESCAC schools for IB (Williams, Middlebury, Amherst) place extremely well into these areas while JHU is a low-semi target and not as present in the industry.
These career paths have no future in the AI era. Dead end. Let me repeat. DEAD END.
Anonymous wrote:will need SAT of 1450-1500 for a D3 sport at JHU, Williams T/O
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:my DC is being recruited by both of these schools for their sport. Two wildly different schools, I know I knowbut top academics certainly at both, and DC really likes coach/team at both. And yes the athletic part is important - but it seems to be a wash. So which school wins out based on the “broken leg test” - if DC decides or can’t compete on the team at some point. They will be an econ major and don’t have a direction in terms of career interest, other than vaguely “finance” or “consulting”, which they know very little about
![]()
any thoughts? pros cons?
Econ, Consulting, Finance.....Williams all the way if IB, MBB might be in the future. The top NESCAC schools for IB (Williams, Middlebury, Amherst) place extremely well into these areas while JHU is a low-semi target and not as present in the industry.
Anonymous wrote:hmmm. is he social?
Williams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both are excellent schools. See what he thinks after the official visits and offers.
Huge difference for an athlete Econ major. iYKYK.
I get it. Some schools being an athlete leads to much better career outcomes than others, especially for finance, econ etc. Williams is one of them.
My kid talked to them but needed a big athletic scholarship and Williams as a D3 doesn't offer them.