Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 18:59     Subject: Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

Anonymous wrote:I think this is best applied to middle school years. When you've known your classmates since you were 4-5 and have been a small group for years, there's not much interest in dating. Plus, there's recess in grades 6-8. And being in the same building with k-5 keeps you a little innocent. I loved when the big kids got to read with their buddies and when they sat with them at mass.

Then there's the lack of vaping, swearing and talking back. Not saying that's rampant elsewhere, but it's nonexistent at most small catholic k-8s.

This is also said with some smugness from some parents because they hold off on phones way longer and control social media/screen time. But I don't know how true that is anymore. Seems our catholic k-8 younger families aren't keeping the same line on that.


On the other hand, sometimes K-8s infantilize their 7th and 8th graders, don't allow them to develop independence and executive functioning skills that a school might emphasize if they were keeping the kids for 9th. Socially, at the smaller schools, they can get sick of each other and feel like there isn't much privacy. And because this kind of K-8 is attractive to kids with special needs, anxiety, mild ASD, etc., and few people join a K-8 in the last few grades, the percentage of the class that needs extra support and/or is below grade level can grow and grow, while the more academically capable kids peel off looking for more of a challenge or they get into a desirable 6-12. So while the 6-8 experience *can* be better in some very real and important ways, it can also have some very significant drawbacks.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 18:45     Subject: Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

At least for Beauvoir it something they say to excuse low academic standards.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 18:00     Subject: Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

I think this is best applied to middle school years. When you've known your classmates since you were 4-5 and have been a small group for years, there's not much interest in dating. Plus, there's recess in grades 6-8. And being in the same building with k-5 keeps you a little innocent. I loved when the big kids got to read with their buddies and when they sat with them at mass.

Then there's the lack of vaping, swearing and talking back. Not saying that's rampant elsewhere, but it's nonexistent at most small catholic k-8s.

This is also said with some smugness from some parents because they hold off on phones way longer and control social media/screen time. But I don't know how true that is anymore. Seems our catholic k-8 younger families aren't keeping the same line on that.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 16:59     Subject: Re:Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

Anonymous wrote:We made the switch to private in 2nd grade, so DS had plenty of time in our public. When he was in K and 1st, he was already worrying about being embarrassed by parents or shoes, on screens for much of the day, and constantly asking about video games, Switch, and Minecraft sweatshirts. In private and he never mentions video games or wanting screen time, they do worksheets and math problems at school, and there isn't any preoccupation with being cool vs embarrassed. The other day I wrote a cute note in his lunch, which he never would have dared do in 1st grade at the public, because he would have been teased. In private he is much more open and seemingly in touch with his feelings, and comfortable to say he loves us, his friends are kind, etc. He's also way better at just playing and puttering around. Apparently at recess all the boys play made up games and run sports drills, so he now does that at home.

I know this isn't true of all kids, but my kid is very very affected by the environment he is in. I've seen a big shift.


It's hilarious to me that people would care less about clothing brands in a private school. Maybe for little boys, but the girls come out caring more because their parents have more to spend. Yes even if there is a uniform.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 16:58     Subject: Re:Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

Anonymous wrote:We made the switch to private in 2nd grade, so DS had plenty of time in our public. When he was in K and 1st, he was already worrying about being embarrassed by parents or shoes, on screens for much of the day, and constantly asking about video games, Switch, and Minecraft sweatshirts. In private and he never mentions video games or wanting screen time, they do worksheets and math problems at school, and there isn't any preoccupation with being cool vs embarrassed. The other day I wrote a cute note in his lunch, which he never would have dared do in 1st grade at the public, because he would have been teased. In private he is much more open and seemingly in touch with his feelings, and comfortable to say he loves us, his friends are kind, etc. He's also way better at just playing and puttering around. Apparently at recess all the boys play made up games and run sports drills, so he now does that at home.

I know this isn't true of all kids, but my kid is very very affected by the environment he is in. I've seen a big shift.


Good lord what bizarre public school were you at? My kids have worksheets and math problems in public, love lunchbox notes, and don't care about shoes at all.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 16:49     Subject: Re:Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

^ I forgot to mention that he doesn't need to do academic enrichment to supplement public school, so now he comes home and plays!
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 16:48     Subject: Re:Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

We made the switch to private in 2nd grade, so DS had plenty of time in our public. When he was in K and 1st, he was already worrying about being embarrassed by parents or shoes, on screens for much of the day, and constantly asking about video games, Switch, and Minecraft sweatshirts. In private and he never mentions video games or wanting screen time, they do worksheets and math problems at school, and there isn't any preoccupation with being cool vs embarrassed. The other day I wrote a cute note in his lunch, which he never would have dared do in 1st grade at the public, because he would have been teased. In private he is much more open and seemingly in touch with his feelings, and comfortable to say he loves us, his friends are kind, etc. He's also way better at just playing and puttering around. Apparently at recess all the boys play made up games and run sports drills, so he now does that at home.

I know this isn't true of all kids, but my kid is very very affected by the environment he is in. I've seen a big shift.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 16:39     Subject: Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Dont worry they speed right on up in 9th grade when the drugs/drinking start.


Boy, that was my experience as a kid. I went to a small Catholic school in Madison, WI (which is a bit different than the east coast, no uniforms, minimal religion that I can recall) and through 8th grade I don't think anyone in my class had kissed another kid, gotten drunk, or done drugs (except one kid who got hemp hard candies and said they were making him high - in hindsight I don't think they had THC).

Anyway, I moved away after 8th grade and went back to visit the next year and shadowed a friend at the high school (same school and campus, mind you) and was gobsmacked. It's like all those things hit hard all at once. Very jarring for me to see that change without the progression over 10 months.


FWIW that was not my experience in Catholic high school and it has not been my kids experience either.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 16:38     Subject: Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I actually think this is about play. In public schools, kids loose access to recess early on. In privates, kids have a chance to learn through play, have more chances to move their bodies, more P.E., and classrooms set up for them to engage in learning in different ways. When we toured a public school kindergarten class, we were surprised with how few toys were there and how little time kids had to exercise.


It is about that for little kids. But for tweens, it's about not exposing them to things that are more appropriate for high schoolers-- basically sexuality in appearance and in media. Sometimes for religious reasons, sometimes not. Personally I do think it's nice to keep that stuff to a minimum-- you have your whole life to be an adult and think about adult things, and it's nice at 12 or 13 to still be a bit sheltered from dating and kissing and everything else.


This was our experience at a Catholic k-8. There were a lot of siblings in the schools, so the middle schoole and elementary age kids actually knew each other and interacted. The school often paired middle schoolers with elementary age kids at school events, and middle school kids often helped the elementary kids with reading, etc. It was lovely. My kids had friends at our local public middle school and their tween experiences were nothing a like. The Catholic middle schoolers didn't grow up as quickly. The fact that our Catholic school had a strict prohibition on phones at school also helped.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 14:53     Subject: Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

I’ve also heard this statement (about staying a kid longer) used in discussing pros and cons of schools that are either K-8 or have the LS and MS together and the HS separate, or something like that, vs 6-12s or schools where the MS is located in/with the HS. In one model the MS kids are more like the big kids in a larger ES, while in the other they are more like the little kids in a big HS. I think there are pros and cons and it depends on the kid, but for some kids - especially late bloomers - being around more children and not so many teens may be helpful. For others, it’s the opposite.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 14:32     Subject: Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

I think it's their personality. My older DD has always wanted to be an adult and was quick to give up childlike things, despite my efforts to keep an age-appropriate setting. My younger one is 10 and actively resisting becoming a tween.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 14:10     Subject: Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

If you think your kid is going going to stay a kid longer because they are in private school, you have no idea about the strength of media, and social media in particular.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 12:49     Subject: Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

Anonymous wrote:I actually think this is about play. In public schools, kids loose access to recess early on. In privates, kids have a chance to learn through play, have more chances to move their bodies, more P.E., and classrooms set up for them to engage in learning in different ways. When we toured a public school kindergarten class, we were surprised with how few toys were there and how little time kids had to exercise.


It is about that for little kids. But for tweens, it's about not exposing them to things that are more appropriate for high schoolers-- basically sexuality in appearance and in media. Sometimes for religious reasons, sometimes not. Personally I do think it's nice to keep that stuff to a minimum-- you have your whole life to be an adult and think about adult things, and it's nice at 12 or 13 to still be a bit sheltered from dating and kissing and everything else.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 12:43     Subject: Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

Anonymous wrote:It's kind of like "we don't teach to the test"-- best case scenario is that it's a good thing, worst case scenario is that it's cope to explain why the kids don't score well.

It's also something parents say when they feel their kid needs a lower pressure setting. Sometimes they just like that for philosophical or cultural reasons, other times it's because of special needs, other times it's because they are in denial of special needs and want to stay in denial.


The expectations of kids in elementary school, especially at the lowest grades, are really not age appropriate. They should be getting physical activity and interacting with others. You can take it to the extreme and say there are no academic standards or lower standards.

I would argue it is about teaching the lower aged kids effectively and still holding them to very high academic standards.
Anonymous
Post 02/12/2026 12:42     Subject: Private schools and allowing kids to "stay younger longer" or "stay kids longer" - what does that mean?

I actually think this is about play. In public schools, kids loose access to recess early on. In privates, kids have a chance to learn through play, have more chances to move their bodies, more P.E., and classrooms set up for them to engage in learning in different ways. When we toured a public school kindergarten class, we were surprised with how few toys were there and how little time kids had to exercise.