Anonymous wrote:Did you guys just see the latest job report?
Wow the forecast was so off. 130k jobs added vs 55k estimated.
health care led job gains in December, adding 82,000 positions. Social assistance also rose, up 42,000
The jobs added reinforced an aging population with only 1 sector namely health care being the only sector continually adding jobs.
Anonymous wrote:These are fake numbers. Look around and tell me what you see. Are people really thriving? How's inflation? I personally know a lot of people silently struggling. These are upper middle class doctors, lawyers, lobbyists, and Feds.
Anonymous wrote:There's never been a discrepancy this large between the industry estimate and BLS. Given how much this administration lies, I don't believe it for a second. The market watchers don't either.
Of course fake numbers absolutely could devastate US stability as the lies show even more volatility and lack of transparency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I saw the headlines I went straight to AI to inquire about revisions. Here's what gemini says
"Based on February 11, 2026, BLS data, the 2025 annual benchmark revision drastically lowered US job growth, showing only 181,000 jobs added for the year, down from the initially reported 584,000. This significant downward revision for March 2025 and subsequent months, totaling roughly 862,000 to 898,000 fewer jobs, indicates a much weaker labor market than previously thought. "
So the Federal reserve was making decisions based on inaccurate data.
This country is too wealthy and has more than enough experts to come up with more timely and accurate job reports.
Too many people want to be the people who opine about the data. Few want to be the fed workers at the bottom of the food chain who produce and compile the data (e.g., Bureau of Labor Statistics).
I worked at another agency long ago and had a coworker who used to say: "BLS waits for me like the pit".
I also interviewed with the IRS Statistics of Income Division long ago and they left me to have a 1:1 conversation with a recent W&M economics grad. She whispered to me that her job was terrible and not to join.
I liked the federal job I finally chose. I had great, committed colleagues and my job felt very productive and socially valuable. I was in more of a policy and regulatory role. The data-gathering shops had more of a boring, low emotional reward reputation. Although the stability and relatively low political pressure was valued at that time. I can only imagine what it's like now with no stability and forced retirements of experienced staff and a President who promotes lying.
Anonymous wrote:These are fake numbers. Look around and tell me what you see. Are people really thriving? How's inflation? I personally know a lot of people silently struggling. These are upper middle class doctors, lawyers, lobbyists, and Feds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you guys just see the latest job report?
Wow the forecast was so off. 130k jobs added vs 55k estimated.
health care led job gains in December, adding 82,000 positions. Social assistance also rose, up 42,000
The jobs added reinforced an aging population with only 1 sector namely health care being the only sector continually adding jobs.
The jobs numbers haven't been credible since Trump fired McEntarfer.
How many worker bees are responsible for compiling parts of this data? You think they would stay quiet if the numbers presented were wildly out of whack?
Hello, I am a worker bee at the Department of Labor in a different division. I am staying quiet about what I see because you can’t run to journalists about things that are just borderline, no one cares about the shenanigans that do get reported, and I need to put food on the table.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I saw the headlines I went straight to AI to inquire about revisions. Here's what gemini says
"Based on February 11, 2026, BLS data, the 2025 annual benchmark revision drastically lowered US job growth, showing only 181,000 jobs added for the year, down from the initially reported 584,000. This significant downward revision for March 2025 and subsequent months, totaling roughly 862,000 to 898,000 fewer jobs, indicates a much weaker labor market than previously thought. "
So the Federal reserve was making decisions based on inaccurate data.
This country is too wealthy and has more than enough experts to come up with more timely and accurate job reports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you guys just see the latest job report?
Wow the forecast was so off. 130k jobs added vs 55k estimated.
health care led job gains in December, adding 82,000 positions. Social assistance also rose, up 42,000
The jobs added reinforced an aging population with only 1 sector namely health care being the only sector continually adding jobs.
The jobs numbers haven't been credible since Trump fired McEntarfer.
How many worker bees are responsible for compiling parts of this data? You think they would stay quiet if the numbers presented were wildly out of whack?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you guys just see the latest job report?
Wow the forecast was so off. 130k jobs added vs 55k estimated.
health care led job gains in December, adding 82,000 positions. Social assistance also rose, up 42,000
The jobs added reinforced an aging population with only 1 sector namely health care being the only sector continually adding jobs.
The jobs numbers haven't been credible since Trump fired McEntarfer.
How many worker bees are responsible for compiling parts of this data? You think they would stay quiet if the numbers presented were wildly out of whack?
Anonymous wrote:When I saw the headlines I went straight to AI to inquire about revisions. Here's what gemini says
"Based on February 11, 2026, BLS data, the 2025 annual benchmark revision drastically lowered US job growth, showing only 181,000 jobs added for the year, down from the initially reported 584,000. This significant downward revision for March 2025 and subsequent months, totaling roughly 862,000 to 898,000 fewer jobs, indicates a much weaker labor market than previously thought. "
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you guys just see the latest job report?
Wow the forecast was so off. 130k jobs added vs 55k estimated.
health care led job gains in December, adding 82,000 positions. Social assistance also rose, up 42,000
The jobs added reinforced an aging population with only 1 sector namely health care being the only sector continually adding jobs.
The jobs numbers haven't been credible since Trump fired McEntarfer.
How many worker bees are responsible for compiling parts of this data? You think they would stay quiet if the numbers presented were wildly out of whack?