Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lower taxes, better regulated borders, disincentives for the able-bodied who choose not to work or who choose to be under-employed, social services limited to those whose situations are not of their own making, allocation of government benefits without regard to recipient immutable characteristics like race, gender, or ethnicity; national right-to-work legislation, and a greatly simplified tax code which neither incentivizes nor punishes personal or corporate behavior favored or disfavored by the government to achieve political objectives.

There are a number of items here that most Americans would agree with. But apart from better control of the southern border, Trump and the GOP is not addressing any of these items or even trying to. And surely progress on any would require compromise, no? So why the constant vilification of the Democratic Party?

Because Democrats used to be the party of the US worker but they have abandoned them.

we want are party back from the globalists

our

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

What are your feelings on racism and pedophilia.....just curious.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

So you’d be happy if you could step over dying poor people begging for mercy at the hospital door while on your way to get your TrumpOzwmpic?

DP. That's not how it works. There should be and have in place welfare programs that should go to people in need. Its the determination of who is using that or who should, that has become a problem with uncontrolled immigration. For instance, I know of people who emigrated from another country in late years who used family immigration loopholes like procuring Greencards then going to claim welfare from medicaid, medicare, food stamps, etc. These are not poor people, they could be living in their own country, but chose to come here using the loopholes and then sucking from the systems. They feel very smart about it. There are illegals using such things too. This is where people have a problem.

So your problem is not with illegal immigrants as much as anyone exploiting existing LEGAL loopholes? Do you have the same sort of ire for billionaires and their corporations paying little to nothing in taxes by exploiting tax loopholes? Then why do we not hear a damn thing about taxing the rich, or making sure that large corporations pay their fair share from folks like you, who instead focus on poor people trying to get by with their minimum wage (or lesser) jobs that no one in this country even wants to do?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

So you’d be happy if you could step over dying poor people begging for mercy at the hospital door while on your way to get your TrumpOzwmpic?

DP. That's not how it works. There should be and have in place welfare programs that should go to people in need. Its the determination of who is using that or who should, that has become a problem with uncontrolled immigration. For instance, I know of people who emigrated from another country in late years who used family immigration loopholes like procuring Greencards then going to claim welfare from medicaid, medicare, food stamps, etc. These are not poor people, they could be living in their own country, but chose to come here using the loopholes and then sucking from the systems. They feel very smart about it. There are illegals using such things too. This is where people have a problem.

This is not how any of these systems work. This scenario is entirely imagined in your sick feeble mind.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

How and why will this make you happy?

They essentially have the mental and emotional capacity of a toddler not wanting to share and being preoccupied with ensuring no one else gets more than them. Social spending is of course fine when it benefits them, I'm sure. I'm sure PP enjoys public roads, bridges, and buildings, a publicly funded electrical grid, publicly funded schools, publicly funded medical research. I'm sure PP has benefited throughout their life from the help and generosity of others despite being smugly convinced they have sank or swim entirely on their own efforts. And PP deludedly believes they could survive in a world without any of the benefits of modern society, community, and cooperation that made this country the country I imagine PP would say they love.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

How and why will this make you happy?

I don't want my vote counter balanced by unverified votes.

.

Dummy: As best you can, think about it... Illegals do not want to intersect with "the system" AT ALL.

Thus, the LAST f***ing place they are going to show up... is a f***ing POLLING CENTER (which is synonymous with "the system," cops, IDs, officialdom, etc.) to... f***ing VOTE. That is NOT a place they want to be.

How did you get so dumb?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

So you’d be happy if you could step over dying poor people begging for mercy at the hospital door while on your way to get your TrumpOzwmpic?

DP. That's not how it works. There should be and have in place welfare programs that should go to people in need. Its the determination of who is using that or who should, that has become a problem with uncontrolled immigration. For instance, I know of people who emigrated from another country in late years who used family immigration loopholes like procuring Greencards then going to claim welfare from medicaid, medicare, food stamps, etc. These are not poor people, they could be living in their own country, but chose to come here using the loopholes and then sucking from the systems. They feel very smart about it. There are illegals using such things too. This is where people have a problem.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

How and why will this make you happy?

I don't want my vote counter balanced by unverified votes.

A welfare state with open borders is doomed.

Illegal immigrants don’t vote in elections and as a group they contribute significantly more to the government in taxes than they take in the form of assistance.

I know you don’t believe either of these thing. But use your imagination. If those two things were proven to be true, would you be happy as is?

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

Dear MAGA dumb-f**k, here's a pro-tip: a rising tide lifts all boats.

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

And I'll bet you're "Christian," right?

Can we go back to the Democratic Party of Bill Clinton? The 1990s were awesome.

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

So you’d be happy if you could step over dying poor people begging for mercy at the hospital door while on your way to get your TrumpOzwmpic?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Name something that doesn’t involve bringing others down. We know it makes you happy to “own the libs”, love Trump tearing down the east wing, and laugh at brown people being hunted in the street. I’m not asking about gloating. What is good in your personal life as a result of this regime? Has your grocery store lowered its prices? Did you finally get that promotion a DEI had stolen from you? Are you making so much money now that your wife can quit her job and stay home where she belongs pumping out babies? Is your child no longer gay? Are you paying less for health insurance? How has your life improved?

Democrats become the party of labor again

Democrats push for mandating e-verify
Democrats push for security for borders
Democrats push for eliminating sanctuary cities
Democrats push for repeal of H1B/OPT/L1 job replacement visas

Democrats become like they were a generation ago.

10 years ago.

No, I'd say a generation ago. I think what we're getting at here is the time when there were blue dog democrats and actual moderate republicans in Congress who would compromise on legislation.

My question is, is holding the line on the MAGA wishlist worth the loss of democracy and sending armed and lawless (and they are because they're not following laws or upholding constitutional rights or following due process) gangs roving through neighborhoods and terrorizing children in schools? I would hope most of us would not be OK with that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don’t want “happy.” They want everyone miserable like they are.

Close.

What will make them happy is seeing "other people" more miserable than they are. So if they're hurting, that's okay, as long as others that they despise are hurting more.

And how exactly would they know if "other people" are more miserable then they are. Plenty of people look happier than MAGA but are just as miserable if not despondent about thier lives--they just know how to keep their misery private. FFS MAGA.

Being shot in the streets in plain daylight, hunted at schools and hospitals, locked up with no accountability... that would make "other people" considerably more miserable, don't you think?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They don’t want “happy.” They want everyone miserable like they are.

Close.

What will make them happy is seeing "other people" more miserable than they are. So if they're hurting, that's okay, as long as others that they despise are hurting more.

And how exactly would they know if "other people" are more miserable then they are. Plenty of people look happier than MAGA but are just as miserable if not despondent about thier lives--they just know how to keep their misery private. FFS MAGA.

There's really no reason for anyone to be miserable in today's world. Life is cushier, lifespans are longer and poor people are fatter than any time in history. It shows that prosperity just makes people more envious and depressed. It shows that people are not very good inside.