Anonymous wrote:I appreciate this. I was shocked initially about possibility of a hemicolectomy. I hoped they could just cut out the small affected section. They explained if surgery is done due to concern of potential cancer, all the associated lymph nodes need to be removed and that whole section of colon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP reporting back. The tissue that was biopsied was precancerous. The part embedded in the wall, was not able to be biopsied.
Options: possible ESD procedure in one year ( with risk of perforation due to location) hemicolectomy, or yearly colonoscopies until it becomes malignant.
This is my understanding. Still processing the info.
That's a lot to process. I'd suggest you get more than one opinion. I don't know if there's a "right" way to go here. At least what you can see is not cancerous at this point. And you'll be under a watchful eye. Good luck.
Thank you very much. Thinking maybe the specialist endoscopist can serve as my second opinion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP reporting back. The tissue that was biopsied was precancerous. The part embedded in the wall, was not able to be biopsied.
Options: possible ESD procedure in one year ( with risk of perforation due to location) hemicolectomy, or yearly colonoscopies until it becomes malignant.
This is my understanding. Still processing the info.
That's a lot to process. I'd suggest you get more than one opinion. I don't know if there's a "right" way to go here. At least what you can see is not cancerous at this point. And you'll be under a watchful eye. Good luck.
Anonymous wrote:OP reporting back. The tissue that was biopsied was precancerous. The part embedded in the wall, was not able to be biopsied.
Options: possible ESD procedure in one year ( with risk of perforation due to location) hemicolectomy, or yearly colonoscopies until it becomes malignant.
This is my understanding. Still processing the info.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What type of polyp is it?
I believe it is a sessile serrated polyp but don’t have the path report yet. The surgeon was not able to remove the whole thing through the scope but IIRC did remove some pieces of it.
I had one of these and went back for a second “enhanced colonoscopy” two months after the first one for them to remove bigger margins. They marked the area with dye so that they could keep an eye on the area with future exams. I think they put me on a 6 month rotation for colonoscopies for a couple of years just to be cautious (now I go every year).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What type of polyp is it?
I believe it is a sessile serrated polyp but don’t have the path report yet. The surgeon was not able to remove the whole thing through the scope but IIRC did remove some pieces of it.
Anonymous wrote:Good luck, OP. Not exactly the same but it was colon surgery. My mom had stage 2 colon cancer back in 2007. I don't know what part of the colon. She had surgery to remove the cancer, and did not need chemo or radiation.
She was 65 years old at the time, and other wise in good shape. She recovered quickly from the surgery. She did have some bathroom urgency issues, where she had to be very close to a bathroom for about a year after. But that stablized and hasn't been a problem since. She's a 19 year survivor now.
Anonymous wrote:My husband had an ESD last summer to remove a large 30 mm polyp, which was benign. He had three back to back colonoscopies about four to six weeks apart. The doctor that found the polyp during the first colonoscopy, tried to remove it during the second one, but was unsuccessful, so my husband was referred to another doctor for an ESD. A surgery was mentioned as an option if ESD was unsuccessful, but was not needed in the end. Husband has to return for his next colonoscopy in three years.