Anonymous wrote:Our high school hadn't gotten anyone into Duke in 6+ years. Last year they rejected all 13 applicants. The kids who were rejected went on to Ivies, Vanderbilt, Michigan, Naval Academy, etc. They were strong candidates.
Then this year, a completely unhooked kid got in ED. She's my close friend's daughter -- she had a great GPA and strong scores, plus some very good ECs, but nothing award winning or THAT special.
So it seemed like maybe our school was blacklisted .... until it wasn't. There really isn't any rhyme or reason to this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DD is a sophomore at a feeder (non-DMV), and looking at SCOIR/Naviance data, it seems like we're on an unofficial Duke blacklist. The graph is barren: a sea of red. Other elite schools are nothing like this. Does anyone else know if these universities have unofficial blacklists against certain high schools?
Are you a UNC feeder? Because Duke hates UNC.
I find most of that data to not be statistically significant and not to tell the whole story. I think some schools definitely are more harsh towards some high schools for reasons that are often difficult to explain. But there is often a story behind it.
Nope, we barely send any to UNC. And I'm curious about that story, which will likely never surface.
I was largely kidding. It is a big rivalry but I don't think it impacts admissions.
+1 Translation since it seems to have gone over the OP's head: the PP is gently mocking you with the UNC comment, and also telling you that making conclusions about a "blacklist" because your tiny private school hasn't had success at Duke is not supported by data. Most HS don't have success at Duke--they're not "blacklisted," they're just not competitive in a tough admissions environment.
The data supports my theory -- ~100 kids applied in 4 years and 3 were accepted. And those 3 were all HYP admits. And our school isn't some irrelevant private either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DD is a sophomore at a feeder (non-DMV), and looking at SCOIR/Naviance data, it seems like we're on an unofficial Duke blacklist. The graph is barren: a sea of red. Other elite schools are nothing like this. Does anyone else know if these universities have unofficial blacklists against certain high schools?
Are you a UNC feeder? Because Duke hates UNC.
I find most of that data to not be statistically significant and not to tell the whole story. I think some schools definitely are more harsh towards some high schools for reasons that are often difficult to explain. But there is often a story behind it.
Nope, we barely send any to UNC. And I'm curious about that story, which will likely never surface.
I was largely kidding. It is a big rivalry but I don't think it impacts admissions.
+1 Translation since it seems to have gone over the OP's head: the PP is gently mocking you with the UNC comment, and also telling you that making conclusions about a "blacklist" because your tiny private school hasn't had success at Duke is not supported by data. Most HS don't have success at Duke--they're not "blacklisted," they're just not competitive in a tough admissions environment.
The data supports my theory -- ~100 kids applied in 4 years and 3 were accepted. And those 3 were all HYP admits. And our school isn't some irrelevant private either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DD is a sophomore at a feeder (non-DMV), and looking at SCOIR/Naviance data, it seems like we're on an unofficial Duke blacklist. The graph is barren: a sea of red. Other elite schools are nothing like this. Does anyone else know if these universities have unofficial blacklists against certain high schools?
Are you a UNC feeder? Because Duke hates UNC.
I find most of that data to not be statistically significant and not to tell the whole story. I think some schools definitely are more harsh towards some high schools for reasons that are often difficult to explain. But there is often a story behind it.
Nope, we barely send any to UNC. And I'm curious about that story, which will likely never surface.
I was largely kidding. It is a big rivalry but I don't think it impacts admissions.
+1 Translation since it seems to have gone over the OP's head: the PP is gently mocking you with the UNC comment, and also telling you that making conclusions about a "blacklist" because your tiny private school hasn't had success at Duke is not supported by data. Most HS don't have success at Duke--they're not "blacklisted," they're just not competitive in a tough admissions environment.
The data supports my theory -- ~100 kids applied in 4 years and 3 were accepted. And those 3 were all HYP admits. And our school isn't some irrelevant private either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do think that Duke has favorites and unfavorites among high schools. Not much to be done about that. Apply and see.
This. If no one has ever gotten in, it won't be your kid. Don't waste an ED.
Anonymous wrote:I do think that Duke has favorites and unfavorites among high schools. Not much to be done about that. Apply and see.