The only four deaths in my circle of friends in our 50s have been men who were athletic. Two cancer, two heart attacks. Yes it’s good to exercise, but hubris is bad. You aren’t in control of all health outcomes.
Anonymous wrote:Exercise doesn't mean you avoid health problems. In fact if I wasn't exercising as aggressively I probably wouldn't have arthritis in my shoulder.
I guess it's time for water aerobics for me.
Anonymous wrote:Why do people ignore the best return on investment?
You can find a gym membership for $50/month. You just need to work out hard 3 to 4 times a week and you will give yourself the best chance to stay healthy
Yet people just don't work out. It amazes me.
Instead folks have million saved, but with a bucket filled of drugs, knees done, hips done, back done...how do you enjoy your money in old age if you are not in good health?
Anonymous wrote:Why do people ignore the best return on investment?
You can find a gym membership for $50/month. You just need to work out hard 3 to 4 times a week and you will give yourself the best chance to stay healthy
Yet people just don't work out. It amazes me.
Instead folks have million saved, but with a bucket filled of drugs, knees done, hips done, back done...how do you enjoy your money in old age if you are not in good health?
Anonymous wrote:The only four deaths in my circle of friends in our 50s have been men who were athletic. Two cancer, two heart attacks. Yes it’s good to exercise, but hubris is bad. You aren’t in control of all health outcomes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The $50/month cost isnt the issue. Its the amount of effort it is for some people to make it to that gym consistently enough to get the health benefits.
Imagine you have to manage child care, or you work long hours and have a long commute, and no energy or time at the end of the day.
Or you have anxiety over trying to access equipment when the gym is crowded (thats the main reason I stopped going).
Sure it would be easy to make this happen if you have an hour or two free each day AND you aren't a human being who has a lot of demotivating factors in your life.
In the middle of my medical specialty training, I still found time to exercise despite small kids, long work hours and long commute. I would wake up at 4:30 and hit the gym from 5-6 before returning home to shower and head to work. It’s not motivation that keeps you going, it’s discipline. It’s understanding that despite the fact that your tired right now, you will feel better later (later today, later this year, later in life) if you go even when you don’t want to.
I strongly believe any time you spend now in improving your health, is the single best investment you can make in overall quality of life. But as a physician, I am surrounded by people who suffer from often preventable illnesses. It’s a constant, daily reminder of why prioritizing my overall health is important.
Anonymous wrote:The $50/month cost isnt the issue. Its the amount of effort it is for some people to make it to that gym consistently enough to get the health benefits.
Imagine you have to manage child care, or you work long hours and have a long commute, and no energy or time at the end of the day.
Or you have anxiety over trying to access equipment when the gym is crowded (thats the main reason I stopped going).
Sure it would be easy to make this happen if you have an hour or two free each day AND you aren't a human being who has a lot of demotivating factors in your life.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know anyone who has millions and is sick or overweight because they don't exercise.
Every single sick and overweight person I know, and many have already passed, are fairly poor.