Anonymous wrote:I went to school in France. We have a different education system. We are graded out of 20. Anyone who gets 16+/20 in some of the core subjects physics, chemistry, math and philosophy is considered a GENIUS.
I can't count the number of times my kids came home with perfect score here in the US lol.
I don't necessarily think the system is broken, I just feel like in the US if you deserve a 100 the teacher gives you a 100. Whereas in France, you are going to be known in the entire grade if you score 17 or 18 out of 20 in physics or math.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two different parts of your brain school requires you to use; one part is for math and science, while another is for English and history. The stronger one part is, the correspondingly weaker the other part is, and vice versa.[i][u]
Since K-12 and the SAT encompass both areas, 4.0s and perfect scores should be impossible. This means the quality of education in the world is very poor.
Where in the world did you get that stupid idea?
Anonymous wrote:There are two different parts of your brain school requires you to use; one part is for math and science, while another is for English and history. The stronger one part is, the correspondingly weaker the other part is, and vice versa.[i][u]
Since K-12 and the SAT encompass both areas, 4.0s and perfect scores should be impossible. This means the quality of education in the world is very poor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two different parts of your brain school requires you to use; one part is for math and science, while another is for English and history. The stronger one part is, the correspondingly weaker the other part is, and vice versa.
Since K-12 and the SAT encompass both areas, 4.0s and perfect scores should be impossible. This means the quality of education in the world is very poor.
Have you never met smart people before?
My husband is this, he went to MIT and he both has an incredible memory (for subjects like history) and incredible processing skills (for math and physics).
Anonymous wrote:Disagree with your premise. One of my kids was near perfect and he just has a curiosity for things so he reads a lot of non fiction. And he likes the Instagram reels with tips and tricks for the SAT. I’m pretty sure that’s all it took for him. His English was the perfect score even though he’s more interested in math and science and will major in engineering.
He’s at a top private and doesn’t know anyone in his class with a perfect score.
As for perfect gpa, kids are smarter than we were. They have access to more information delivered on more platforms. He can listen to podcasts about US history forever, he could have probably scored a 5 on the AP class without taking the class. He can look up chemistry tutorials 24/7. When we hit a wall in high school chemistry, that was it. They can get information and move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two different parts of your brain school requires you to use; one part is for math and science, while another is for English and history. The stronger one part is, the correspondingly weaker the other part is, and vice versa.
Since K-12 and the SAT encompass both areas, 4.0s and perfect scores should be impossible. This means the quality of education in the world is very poor.
This is like saying that if your left arm is strong your right must be weak so pull ups should be impossible.
+1. There's no reason that one area being strong means the other is weak. That's just not how it works.
Maybe not but when people excel at a certain skill it’s because their brain has what it takes. Artists have better spatial intelligence than the non-artist. Scans of artists brains show that the artist group have more grey matter in the area of the brain called the precuneus in the parietal lobe.
Yes but they don't have below average verbal intelligence than the non-artist.
Anonymous wrote:Disagree with your premise. One of my kids was near perfect and he just has a curiosity for things so he reads a lot of non fiction. And he likes the Instagram reels with tips and tricks for the SAT. I’m pretty sure that’s all it took for him. His English was the perfect score even though he’s more interested in math and science and will major in engineering.
He’s at a top private and doesn’t know anyone in his class with a perfect score.
As for perfect gpa, kids are smarter than we were. They have access to more information delivered on more platforms. He can listen to podcasts about US history forever, he could have probably scored a 5 on the AP class without taking the class. He can look up chemistry tutorials 24/7. When we hit a wall in high school chemistry, that was it. They can get information and move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“ The stronger one part is, the correspondingly weaker the other part is, and vice versa.”
Where did you come up with this? There is no neuroscience basis for this assertion.
While I do believe that both standardized testing and grading have been made easier, there really are some kids who excel. I went to a very competitive private school in the 90s that had loads of homework and very strenuous grading standards. Every year there would be 2-3 kids in a class of 70-75 who would earn 4.0s and score 1600s.
I did my undergraduate degree in chemistry and my graduate degree in history. But of course that's impossible, right?
The high school curriculum is completely introductory. While I'd agree with you that there's a lot of grade inflation and that they've dumbed down the SAT, there's no reason that an intelligent person couldn't learn both single variable calculus and history. If they got rid of grade inflation there would still be students with 4.0 GPAs--just not as many of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two different parts of your brain school requires you to use; one part is for math and science, while another is for English and history. The stronger one part is, the correspondingly weaker the other part is, and vice versa.
Since K-12 and the SAT encompass both areas, 4.0s and perfect scores should be impossible. This means the quality of education in the world is very poor.
This is like saying that if your left arm is strong your right must be weak so pull ups should be impossible.
+1. There's no reason that one area being strong means the other is weak. That's just not how it works.
Maybe not but when people excel at a certain skill it’s because their brain has what it takes. Artists have better spatial intelligence than the non-artist. Scans of artists brains show that the artist group have more grey matter in the area of the brain called the precuneus in the parietal lobe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two different parts of your brain school requires you to use; one part is for math and science, while another is for English and history. The stronger one part is, the correspondingly weaker the other part is, and vice versa.
Since K-12 and the SAT encompass both areas, 4.0s and perfect scores should be impossible. This means the quality of education in the world is very poor.
Have you never met smart people before?
My husband is this, he went to MIT and he both has an incredible memory (for subjects like history) and incredible processing skills (for math and physics).
Anonymous wrote:“ The stronger one part is, the correspondingly weaker the other part is, and vice versa.”
Where did you come up with this? There is no neuroscience basis for this assertion.
While I do believe that both standardized testing and grading have been made easier, there really are some kids who excel. I went to a very competitive private school in the 90s that had loads of homework and very strenuous grading standards. Every year there would be 2-3 kids in a class of 70-75 who would earn 4.0s and score 1600s.