Anonymous wrote:I think it’s fine. Crossing the border is a crime, and police has the right to enter a home if a crime is committed. What is so controversial about that?
]Anonymous wrote:if Dems ever gain control of Congress, they better systematically impeach wide swaths of appointees, and criminally charge others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The question now is, what can anyone do about it? Typically pushing for unconstitutional acts would lead to leadership being fired but that isn’t going to happen so now what? Call congress? The Supreme Court?
This is what your second amendment rights are for. If all other right fall away, our constitution gives you the right to fight and defend yourself. That's where we are at. There's no guarantee that right will be honored and no guarantee you will survive. But all we have left is to fight or comply.
I’m actually curious how this would play out in a court. Let’s say a door gets kicked down these guys come rushing in, the homeowner has an A.R. 15 and defends himself or herself and kills the agents. The agents have no warrant, and the homeowner ends up being a person in the country legally.
Is the government going to try to then say the people no longer have the right to defend their homes?
Assuming they don’t mow him down, I am certain they would call him a domestic terrorist and try to charge him with murder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The question now is, what can anyone do about it? Typically pushing for unconstitutional acts would lead to leadership being fired but that isn’t going to happen so now what? Call congress? The Supreme Court?
This is what your second amendment rights are for. If all other right fall away, our constitution gives you the right to fight and defend yourself. That's where we are at. There's no guarantee that right will be honored and no guarantee you will survive. But all we have left is to fight or comply.
I’m actually curious how this would play out in a court. Let’s say a door gets kicked down these guys come rushing in, the homeowner has an A.R. 15 and defends himself or herself and kills the agents. The agents have no warrant, and the homeowner ends up being a person in the country legally.
Is the government going to try to then say the people no longer have the right to defend their homes?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The question now is, what can anyone do about it? Typically pushing for unconstitutional acts would lead to leadership being fired but that isn’t going to happen so now what? Call congress? The Supreme Court?
This is what your second amendment rights are for. If all other right fall away, our constitution gives you the right to fight and defend yourself. That's where we are at. There's no guarantee that right will be honored and no guarantee you will survive. But all we have left is to fight or comply.
Anonymous wrote:Hey Don't Tread On Me crowd, where you at? You were crying about wearing a mask to not kill grandma. Where are you now, tough guys?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The question now is, what can anyone do about it? Typically pushing for unconstitutional acts would lead to leadership being fired but that isn’t going to happen so now what? Call congress? The Supreme Court?
Defund ICE. But Democrats are scare to be called weak on crime. So here we are.
We really need to primary any DINOs that won’t shut the government down over this.
Oh yeah, that will help our cause. 🙄
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The question now is, what can anyone do about it? Typically pushing for unconstitutional acts would lead to leadership being fired but that isn’t going to happen so now what? Call congress? The Supreme Court?
Defund ICE. But Democrats are scare to be called weak on crime. So here we are.
We really need to primary any DINOs that won’t shut the government down over this.
Oh yeah, that will help our cause. 🙄
Anonymous wrote:
Important correction to your title, PP. They didn’t say no more warrants; they said no judicial warrants. That means no warrant signed by a judge which is the gold standard. They would still need a warrant but it would be issued by ICE so would have lower standards presumably.
Anonymous wrote:
The question now is, what can anyone do about it? Typically pushing for unconstitutional acts would lead to leadership being fired but that isn’t going to happen so now what? Call congress? The Supreme Court?
Anonymous wrote:MAGA don't care, they are very vocal on any other ICE thread. Radio silence here. If it happened under a Democratic president though, you know they would he screaming their heads off like the hypocrites they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The question now is, what can anyone do about it? Typically pushing for unconstitutional acts would lead to leadership being fired but that isn’t going to happen so now what? Call congress? The Supreme Court?
Defund ICE. But Democrats are scare to be called weak on crime. So here we are.
We really need to primary any DINOs that won’t shut the government down over this.