Anonymous wrote:What an important speech for countries of the world being bullied by the US. Here is an excerpt:
"In 1978, the Czech dissident Václav Havel, later president, wrote an essay called “The Power of the Powerless,” and in it he asked a simple question: how did the communist system sustain itself?
And his answer began with a greengrocer.
Every morning, the shopkeeper places a sign in his window: “Workers of the world unite.” He doesn’t believe in it. No one does. But he places the sign anyway to avoid trouble, to signal compliance, to get along. And because every shopkeeper on every street does the same, the system persists — not through violence alone, but through the participation of ordinary people in rituals they privately know to be false.
Havel called this living within a lie. The system’s power comes not from its truth, but from everyone’s willingness to perform as if it were true. And its fragility comes from the same source. When even one person stops performing, when the greengrocer removes his sign, the illusion begins to crack.
Friends, it is time for companies and countries to take their signs down."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just watched the speech as a Canadian. I am proud of our PM. I know live in a place that would feel definitely be a military target for the US. At least we go down with integrity if it ever happens.
I'm sorry PP. Truly.
Anonymous wrote:I just watched the speech as a Canadian. I am proud of our PM. I know live in a place that would feel definitely be a military target for the US. At least we go down with integrity if it ever happens.
Anonymous wrote:Back to the speech:
One of the best I’ve heard in a while.
Anonymous wrote:The French gave Trump Intel in confIdence because they suspected he was leaking to Putin. So they set up a sting. He gave it to Putin. He did.
The Rosenberg's were hung for doing this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting that I’ve heard the word “appeasement” a few times from other leaders.
This seems a lot like a not so veiled warning and reference to Neville.
ya think?
Of course.
I think the Pp was being sarcastic. The only way Carney could have made what he was saying more obvious is if he made his speech in front of a picture of Hitler and the swastika
I know, I was simply calling out the angsty teen tone of their needless reply.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting that I’ve heard the word “appeasement” a few times from other leaders.
This seems a lot like a not so veiled warning and reference to Neville.
ya think?
Of course.
I think the Pp was being sarcastic. The only way Carney could have made what he was saying more obvious is if he made his speech in front of a picture of Hitler and the swastika
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting that I’ve heard the word “appeasement” a few times from other leaders.
This seems a lot like a not so veiled warning and reference to Neville.
ya think?
Of course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting that I’ve heard the word “appeasement” a few times from other leaders.
This seems a lot like a not so veiled warning and reference to Neville.
ya think?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s interesting that I’ve heard the word “appeasement” a few times from other leaders.
This seems a lot like a not so veiled warning and reference to Neville.
DUH.