Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks, all. This is OP. This was very useful. We will set it up in kid’s name only and tell of its existence but talk about benefits of not touching it and letting it grow until it’s needed for something bigger. That was useful information about how a joint account could run into tax issues so we won’t do it that way.
I would either give the money for the kid to use as he wants, or hold back until he is more established. The in-between situation can be risky. A relative's young adult child developed a drug addiction after college and it was worsened by her having access to a large amount of money that had been gifted to her and held for later. Once it is in your kid's name you can't get it back.
This. What is the point of setting up an account in their name if you don't want them to use it yet? If you are managing it, they aren't really learning to manage their money, and in fact if they know they have this money to fall back on, they may be more cavalier about managing their own income.
If you want to help them buy a house one day, just save for it yourself and when the time comes, tell them of your gift then.
Google AI came to the consensus that giving regular gifts can create a sense of entitlement and that they should be specific and irregular. I like that answer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I struggle with this idea. My kids are teens, so I haven't really put too much thought into this yet, but I worry that I would spoil them in adulthood by gifting them all this money. In one hand I would say if its a gift, then you give them a check and take the risk they blow it or it demotivates them in their career. I think my approach would be a matching system. They have a goal such as save for a house, pay down a debt, or build a nest egg, and I match up to the gift amount each year. That way there is incentive for them to make the best use of it.
Call me when you find a family where this worked well. I can think of one, and they’re all doctors. The parents and the kids. Highly motivated, high achieving, regimented, and inclined to authoritative systems.
Any family where someone actually needs an “incentive” to “make the best use,” it doesn’t work at all and strains relationships.
If you’re using money to try to control your adult children, you’re either forcing them to stay in “child” mode (which we’ve all seen among the adult children of rich people) or they will be seething on the inside or they will have to say “no thank you” and forge their own path. It’s worse for boys.
I’m often in “child mode” with my wealthy parents. It’s corrosive! I manage it okay I think, and I honestly think it helps that I’m a woman and am the caregiver type anyway. Plus clearly, I’m “paid” really well. It’s been harder for my brother. And for some of our cousins, it’s really bad.
Give the money or don’t give the money. Don’t try to use it as a carrot or a stick. It won’t work.
Thats why I say its tied to a goal they have, not one that I have. If they have no goals then there is no discussion about it.
But I also think if I gave all my kids $20k per year each no strings attached and they disrespected me, there would be more relationship strain there, dont you think? So it seems better to just not gift anything at all and just let the money flow when I die?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I struggle with this idea. My kids are teens, so I haven't really put too much thought into this yet, but I worry that I would spoil them in adulthood by gifting them all this money. In one hand I would say if its a gift, then you give them a check and take the risk they blow it or it demotivates them in their career. I think my approach would be a matching system. They have a goal such as save for a house, pay down a debt, or build a nest egg, and I match up to the gift amount each year. That way there is incentive for them to make the best use of it.
Call me when you find a family where this worked well. I can think of one, and they’re all doctors. The parents and the kids. Highly motivated, high achieving, regimented, and inclined to authoritative systems.
Any family where someone actually needs an “incentive” to “make the best use,” it doesn’t work at all and strains relationships.
If you’re using money to try to control your adult children, you’re either forcing them to stay in “child” mode (which we’ve all seen among the adult children of rich people) or they will be seething on the inside or they will have to say “no thank you” and forge their own path. It’s worse for boys.
I’m often in “child mode” with my wealthy parents. It’s corrosive! I manage it okay I think, and I honestly think it helps that I’m a woman and am the caregiver type anyway. Plus clearly, I’m “paid” really well. It’s been harder for my brother. And for some of our cousins, it’s really bad.
Give the money or don’t give the money. Don’t try to use it as a carrot or a stick. It won’t work.
Thats why I say its tied to a goal they have, not one that I have. If they have no goals then there is no discussion about it.
But I also think if I gave all my kids $20k per year each no strings attached and they disrespected me, there would be more relationship strain there, dont you think? So it seems better to just not gift anything at all and just let the money flow when I die?
If the "gift" is predicated on respect, or not being "disrespected" according to whatever you think that encompasses, that's behavioral extortion. Keep your money.
It's a gift in the legal sense. The point i was making is relationship strain is inevitable whether a monetary gift has a purpose (to achieve a financial goal) or whether its just to share wealth. There is no way you are going to not resent someone who doesnt show appreciation for something you give them.
Or are you capable of giving with zero emotions attached? Honest question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks, all. This is OP. This was very useful. We will set it up in kid’s name only and tell of its existence but talk about benefits of not touching it and letting it grow until it’s needed for something bigger. That was useful information about how a joint account could run into tax issues so we won’t do it that way.
I would either give the money for the kid to use as he wants, or hold back until he is more established. The in-between situation can be risky. A relative's young adult child developed a drug addiction after college and it was worsened by her having access to a large amount of money that had been gifted to her and held for later. Once it is in your kid's name you can't get it back.
This. What is the point of setting up an account in their name if you don't want them to use it yet? If you are managing it, they aren't really learning to manage their money, and in fact if they know they have this money to fall back on, they may be more cavalier about managing their own income.
If you want to help them buy a house one day, just save for it yourself and when the time comes, tell them of your gift then.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks, all. This is OP. This was very useful. We will set it up in kid’s name only and tell of its existence but talk about benefits of not touching it and letting it grow until it’s needed for something bigger. That was useful information about how a joint account could run into tax issues so we won’t do it that way.
I would either give the money for the kid to use as he wants, or hold back until he is more established. The in-between situation can be risky. A relative's young adult child developed a drug addiction after college and it was worsened by her having access to a large amount of money that had been gifted to her and held for later. Once it is in your kid's name you can't get it back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I struggle with this idea. My kids are teens, so I haven't really put too much thought into this yet, but I worry that I would spoil them in adulthood by gifting them all this money. In one hand I would say if its a gift, then you give them a check and take the risk they blow it or it demotivates them in their career. I think my approach would be a matching system. They have a goal such as save for a house, pay down a debt, or build a nest egg, and I match up to the gift amount each year. That way there is incentive for them to make the best use of it.
Call me when you find a family where this worked well. I can think of one, and they’re all doctors. The parents and the kids. Highly motivated, high achieving, regimented, and inclined to authoritative systems.
Any family where someone actually needs an “incentive” to “make the best use,” it doesn’t work at all and strains relationships.
If you’re using money to try to control your adult children, you’re either forcing them to stay in “child” mode (which we’ve all seen among the adult children of rich people) or they will be seething on the inside or they will have to say “no thank you” and forge their own path. It’s worse for boys.
I’m often in “child mode” with my wealthy parents. It’s corrosive! I manage it okay I think, and I honestly think it helps that I’m a woman and am the caregiver type anyway. Plus clearly, I’m “paid” really well. It’s been harder for my brother. And for some of our cousins, it’s really bad.
Give the money or don’t give the money. Don’t try to use it as a carrot or a stick. It won’t work.
Thats why I say its tied to a goal they have, not one that I have. If they have no goals then there is no discussion about it.
But I also think if I gave all my kids $20k per year each no strings attached and they disrespected me, there would be more relationship strain there, dont you think? So it seems better to just not gift anything at all and just let the money flow when I die?
If the "gift" is predicated on respect, or not being "disrespected" according to whatever you think that encompasses, that's behavioral extortion. Keep your money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I struggle with this idea. My kids are teens, so I haven't really put too much thought into this yet, but I worry that I would spoil them in adulthood by gifting them all this money. In one hand I would say if its a gift, then you give them a check and take the risk they blow it or it demotivates them in their career. I think my approach would be a matching system. They have a goal such as save for a house, pay down a debt, or build a nest egg, and I match up to the gift amount each year. That way there is incentive for them to make the best use of it.
Call me when you find a family where this worked well. I can think of one, and they’re all doctors. The parents and the kids. Highly motivated, high achieving, regimented, and inclined to authoritative systems.
Any family where someone actually needs an “incentive” to “make the best use,” it doesn’t work at all and strains relationships.
If you’re using money to try to control your adult children, you’re either forcing them to stay in “child” mode (which we’ve all seen among the adult children of rich people) or they will be seething on the inside or they will have to say “no thank you” and forge their own path. It’s worse for boys.
I’m often in “child mode” with my wealthy parents. It’s corrosive! I manage it okay I think, and I honestly think it helps that I’m a woman and am the caregiver type anyway. Plus clearly, I’m “paid” really well. It’s been harder for my brother. And for some of our cousins, it’s really bad.
Give the money or don’t give the money. Don’t try to use it as a carrot or a stick. It won’t work.
Thats why I say its tied to a goal they have, not one that I have. If they have no goals then there is no discussion about it.
But I also think if I gave all my kids $20k per year each no strings attached and they disrespected me, there would be more relationship strain there, dont you think? So it seems better to just not gift anything at all and just let the money flow when I die?
Anonymous wrote:Thanks, all. This is OP. This was very useful. We will set it up in kid’s name only and tell of its existence but talk about benefits of not touching it and letting it grow until it’s needed for something bigger. That was useful information about how a joint account could run into tax issues so we won’t do it that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I struggle with this idea. My kids are teens, so I haven't really put too much thought into this yet, but I worry that I would spoil them in adulthood by gifting them all this money. In one hand I would say if its a gift, then you give them a check and take the risk they blow it or it demotivates them in their career. I think my approach would be a matching system. They have a goal such as save for a house, pay down a debt, or build a nest egg, and I match up to the gift amount each year. That way there is incentive for them to make the best use of it.
Call me when you find a family where this worked well. I can think of one, and they’re all doctors. The parents and the kids. Highly motivated, high achieving, regimented, and inclined to authoritative systems.
Any family where someone actually needs an “incentive” to “make the best use,” it doesn’t work at all and strains relationships.
If you’re using money to try to control your adult children, you’re either forcing them to stay in “child” mode (which we’ve all seen among the adult children of rich people) or they will be seething on the inside or they will have to say “no thank you” and forge their own path. It’s worse for boys.
I’m often in “child mode” with my wealthy parents. It’s corrosive! I manage it okay I think, and I honestly think it helps that I’m a woman and am the caregiver type anyway. Plus clearly, I’m “paid” really well. It’s been harder for my brother. And for some of our cousins, it’s really bad.
Give the money or don’t give the money. Don’t try to use it as a carrot or a stick. It won’t work.
Anonymous wrote:I struggle with this idea. My kids are teens, so I haven't really put too much thought into this yet, but I worry that I would spoil them in adulthood by gifting them all this money. In one hand I would say if its a gift, then you give them a check and take the risk they blow it or it demotivates them in their career. I think my approach would be a matching system. They have a goal such as save for a house, pay down a debt, or build a nest egg, and I match up to the gift amount each year. That way there is incentive for them to make the best use of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:we set one up for each of our kids many years ago - as a joint account but kids as primary owners and me as secondary. each has about 320k right now. they all have good jobs. we have it with vanguard
This has the potential to raise gift tax issues of you care about that