Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's wrong with conserving energy while not in use? Are you actually upset because you had to wait until it heats up?
This is the norm in Europe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's wrong with conserving energy while not in use? Are you actually upset because you had to wait until it heats up?
It takes more energy to heat up a house from 45 than to keep it at a lower temp like 65 and raise it to 68 or whatever
Anonymous wrote:What's wrong with conserving energy while not in use? Are you actually upset because you had to wait until it heats up?
Anonymous wrote:What's wrong with conserving energy while not in use? Are you actually upset because you had to wait until it heats up?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's wrong with conserving energy while not in use? Are you actually upset because you had to wait until it heats up?
Yes I’m upset I had to wait 4-5 hours for it to warm up, and that no one in my family could shower. I was also upset that I had to unpack wearing a coat.
4-5 hours? Yeah, right!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's wrong with conserving energy while not in use? Are you actually upset because you had to wait until it heats up?
Yes I’m upset I had to wait 4-5 hours for it to warm up, and that no one in my family could shower. I was also upset that I had to unpack wearing a coat.
4-5 hours? Yeah, right!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's wrong with conserving energy while not in use? Are you actually upset because you had to wait until it heats up?
Yes I’m upset I had to wait 4-5 hours for it to warm up, and that no one in my family could shower. I was also upset that I had to unpack wearing a coat.