Anonymous wrote:Obama has shared his favorites lists for 2025. He tends to have great taste in books.
On the books list: Paper Girl by Beth Macy, Flashlight by Susan Choi, We the People by Jill Lepore, The Wilderness by Angela Flournoy, There is No Place for Us by Brian Goldstone, North Sun by Ethan Rutherford, 1929 by Andrew Sorkin, The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny by Kiran Desai, Dead and Alive by Zadie Smith, What We Can Know by Ethan McEwan. In the same post he mentioned some books he had already mentioned as favorites this summer, and that list has Mark Twain by Ron Chernow, The Book of Records by Madeleine Thien, King of Ashes by SA Cosby, Rosarita by Anita Desai, Audition by Katie Kitamura, The Buffalo Hunter Hunter by Stephen Jones, Abundance by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson, A Marriage at Sea by Sophie Elmhirst, Who is Government? by Michael Lewis, and The Siren's Call by Chris Hayes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Why?
Because it appears to be entirely "curated" in order to garner approval from naive people, such as yourself.
So? Every “best of” list is curated.
Yes, and when the NYtimes does it, say the "best of 2025" list, you know it's based on books they have reviewed that year. Not one person, but a group of journalists and they vote on it. When Obama produces a list, it appears to be chosen by him personally, but it is not, it's just a PR exercise dressed up to make him look good. He may have read the books, but some PR person has handed them to him, for the purposes of building this list.
If you want to engage with fakery and treat it as real, knock yourself out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Why?
Because it appears to be entirely "curated" in order to garner approval from naive people, such as yourself.
So? Every “best of” list is curated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Why?
Because it appears to be entirely "curated" in order to garner approval from naive people, such as yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Yeah, no. That’s how real people who actually read, read. I don’t sit on the beach with Faulkner, and neither do you.
Ha! Actually I do. I have a PhD in Literature and I'm a writer by profession, so we differ hugely. I also don't sit on beaches.
So she’s right. You don’t sit on the beach with Faulkner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Yeah, no. That’s how real people who actually read, read. I don’t sit on the beach with Faulkner, and neither do you.
Ha! Actually I do. I have a PhD in Literature and I'm a writer by profession, so we differ hugely. I also don't sit on beaches.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I miss having a president who reads books.
+1.
Obama’s annual best of lists are always great— I also love his music list. I’m sure he gets help but wow they’re good in highlighting both low and high brow, mass appeal and niche, etc.
yeah, it does achieve that, which kind of also undermines the list entirely.
Why?
Because it appears to be entirely "curated" in order to garner approval from naive people, such as yourself.