Anonymous wrote:If VT is your DC’s #1 choice, what is your safety? Most kids we know are either going to JMU or going out of state to a flagship if VT is a deny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish VT would just reimplement ED so those who have it as their first choice could express that!!
Or they can implement what all these other major flagships do for EA and notify earlier than late Feb!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:VT non-engineering is much easier than VT engineering. JMU does not offer specific engineering degrees, so I am guessing srudent is not an engineering applicant.
It's increasingly not "much easier" at all.
That is not what the SCHEV data says.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would consider GMU as a good alternate if VT does not work out. They have good Engineering and CS. For kids in the higher stats quartile, I would consider GMU a safety. But if the stats are lower, then GMU might become another "target" and not a safety
this. GMU engineering is held in high regard
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:VT non-engineering is much easier than VT engineering. JMU does not offer specific engineering degrees, so I am guessing srudent is not an engineering applicant.
It's increasingly not "much easier" at all.
Anonymous wrote:I wish VT would just reimplement ED so those who have it as their first choice could express that!!
Anonymous wrote:We went with OOS flagships. Engineering major. In at Auburn, Clemson, Delaware, Penn State, Pitt and South Carolina so far. Starting to visit campuses to narrow down, though VT is first choice. Wish they would release EA decisions a bit earlier than mid-Feb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would consider GMU as a good alternate if VT does not work out. They have good Engineering and CS. For kids in the higher stats quartile, I would consider GMU a safety. But if the stats are lower, then GMU might become another "target" and not a safety
this. GMU engineering is held in high regard
Ugh, that can't be comparable to a big, real university like VT. GMU is just basically like an expensive NVCC. No fun vibes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would consider GMU as a good alternate if VT does not work out. They have good Engineering and CS. For kids in the higher stats quartile, I would consider GMU a safety. But if the stats are lower, then GMU might become another "target" and not a safety
this. GMU engineering is held in high regard
Anonymous wrote:I would consider GMU as a good alternate if VT does not work out. They have good Engineering and CS. For kids in the higher stats quartile, I would consider GMU a safety. But if the stats are lower, then GMU might become another "target" and not a safety
Anonymous wrote:VT non-engineering is much easier than VT engineering. JMU does not offer specific engineering degrees, so I am guessing srudent is not an engineering applicant.