Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rice took 10% of its class in questbridge.
How do these kids tend to stack up academically? I hate Trump but I don't disagree with him that DEI has gotten out of hand. I am all for breaking a tie or even slightly more than that towards kids who have had fewer opportunities. But "aiming for a target number" is not in the spirit of this...
What are you even talking about? Schools aim for target numbers of football players and target numbers of kids from the DMV and target numbers of cellists and target numbers of kids from congressionally-overrepresented states and target numbers of rural (read: Republican) parts of the country.
What "spirit" are you talking about and is it the spirit of Adam Smith or Milton Friedman and should institutional priorities actually be shaped by the invisible hand of anti-DEI brainwashed mediocrity?
Asking for "these kids" and SMDH
Anonymous wrote:Take Rice as an example, ED1 round this year they took 30% Questbridge alone, "the largest [Questbridge] cohorts ever from those admission pools". Then there are other hooked applicants. Not so many seats left for unhooked applicants.
I think Cornell may be doing the same. We got zero ED admit this year to Cornell. Unusual.
https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/joy-surprise-and-tears-rice-welcomes-record-early-decision-class-2030-0
Better chance at RD?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rice took 10% of its class in questbridge.
How do these kids tend to stack up academically? I hate Trump but I don't disagree with him that DEI has gotten out of hand. I am all for breaking a tie or even slightly more than that towards kids who have had fewer opportunities. But "aiming for a target number" is not in the spirit of this...
Anonymous wrote:UVA ED was harder at our school than year’s past.
Anonymous wrote:Questbridge is not ED. Two separate processes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rice took 10% of its class in questbridge.
How do these kids tend to stack up academically? I hate Trump but I don't disagree with him that DEI has gotten out of hand. I am all for breaking a tie or even slightly more than that towards kids who have had fewer opportunities. But "aiming for a target number" is not in the spirit of this...
Anonymous wrote:Take Rice as an example, ED1 round this year they took 30% Questbridge alone, "the largest [Questbridge] cohorts ever from those admission pools". Then there are other hooked applicants. Not so many seats left for unhooked applicants.
I think Cornell may be doing the same. We got zero ED admit this year to Cornell. Unusual.
https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/joy-surprise-and-tears-rice-welcomes-record-early-decision-class-2030-0
Better chance at RD?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rice took 10% of its class in questbridge.
How do these kids tend to stack up academically? I hate Trump but I don't disagree with him that DEI has gotten out of hand. I am all for breaking a tie or even slightly more than that towards kids who have had fewer opportunities. But "aiming for a target number" is not in the spirit of this...
Anonymous wrote:Rice took 10% of its class in questbridge.
Anonymous wrote:Rice took 10% of its class in questbridge.