Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Salaries and benefits for in-school teachers and staff dominate the FCPS budget. Everything else is in the weeds. All the whining about security details, Gatehouse, etc. is really silly when you actually look at the numbers.

Waste is waste. And, with each of those highly paid staffers working for Reid there comes a staff.

How many people do you think work on her flashy photos and composing the website? What do the photos posted each week have in common? (a pic of our superintendent with children).
She spends her time going from school to school --yet pays no attention to what the communities need.

For example: the new high school has a community that needs and wants the school. They also want to know who is in and who is out. Yet, she is delaying that to summer. Why? I don't know, but my guess is that she still thinks she can make it into a magnet. It makes no sense the way she has handled this. Meanwhile, we get VERY long messages every week with glossy photos on the website.

Look at the staff and how much they make. How many actually spend time on academics? Not many.

Look at the mess of the boundary review. It appears that they have given all this time to transparency--yet, in the end, the decision will be whoever is last to scream the most.

You can look up what her staff is like, how many people etc.

You won't, you just want to whine and complain and blame everyone else for anything you think is "unjust" to you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These are the things that should go.

AAP Centers
FLES and Magnet programs. These are wants not needs.
High Schools should charge for Ap and IB tests unless FARM.
Cut bloat at Gatehouse - especially equity department.

Let’s start with that.

FLES should not be cut you ignorant Anglocentric buffoon.

Our kids should have the ability to learn a foreign language, since it will allow them to become worldly thinkers.

Spanish, French, Arabic, German, Mandarin, Japanese, and Korean are some of the most widely spoken languages.

Depriving our students of linguistic experience is more harmful than beneficial.

But stay Anglisch my friend,

You do understand that FLES is not immersion right? It’s a program exclusive to elementary schools where kids get 1 hour of a watered down foreign language instruction once per week. FLES is a total waste of resources.

Immersion on the other hand is a great program.

I know what FLES is and know the differences it has with immersion.

That is why I sent my kids to an immersion school where consequentially, we have been on family trips with friends of my kids to explore the culture tied to the Language.

That language, of course, being Español.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Salaries and benefits for in-school teachers and staff dominate the FCPS budget. Everything else is in the weeds. All the whining about security details, Gatehouse, etc. is really silly when you actually look at the numbers.

Waste is waste. And, with each of those highly paid staffers working for Reid there comes a staff.

How many people do you think work on her flashy photos and composing the website? What do the photos posted each week have in common? (a pic of our superintendent with children).
She spends her time going from school to school --yet pays no attention to what the communities need.

For example: the new high school has a community that needs and wants the school. They also want to know who is in and who is out. Yet, she is delaying that to summer. Why? I don't know, but my guess is that she still thinks she can make it into a magnet. It makes no sense the way she has handled this. Meanwhile, we get VERY long messages every week with glossy photos on the website.

Look at the staff and how much they make. How many actually spend time on academics? Not many.

Look at the mess of the boundary review. It appears that they have given all this time to transparency--yet, in the end, the decision will be whoever is last to scream the most.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These are the things that should go.

AAP Centers
FLES and Magnet programs. These are wants not needs.
High Schools should charge for Ap and IB tests unless FARM.
Cut bloat at Gatehouse - especially equity department.

Let’s start with that.

FLES should not be cut you ignorant Anglocentric buffoon.

Our kids should have the ability to learn a foreign language, since it will allow them to become worldly thinkers.

Spanish, French, Arabic, German, Mandarin, Japanese, and Korean are some of the most widely spoken languages.

Depriving our students of linguistic experience is more harmful than beneficial.

But stay Anglisch my friend,

You do understand that FLES is not immersion right? It’s a program exclusive to elementary schools where kids get 1 hour of a watered down foreign language instruction once per week. FLES is a total waste of resources.

Immersion on the other hand is a great program.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These are the things that should go.

AAP Centers
FLES and Magnet programs. These are wants not needs.
High Schools should charge for Ap and IB tests unless FARM.
Cut bloat at Gatehouse - especially equity department.

Let’s start with that.

FLES should not be cut you ignorant Anglocentric buffoon.

Our kids should have the ability to learn a foreign language, since it will allow them to become worldly thinkers.

Spanish, French, Arabic, German, Mandarin, Japanese, and Korean are some of the most widely spoken languages.

Depriving our students of linguistic experience is more harmful than beneficial.

But stay Anglisch my friend,

You do understand that FLES is not immersion right? It’s a program exclusive to elementary schools where kids get 1 hour of a watered down foreign language instruction once per week. FLES is a total waste of resources.

Immersion on the other hand is a great program.

I cannot speak to immersion, but I can speak to FLES. It accomplishes nothing. If anyone thinks the kids learn the language with this spotty instruction, they are sadly mistaken.
Teacher whose kids had "foreign language instruction" twice a week.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These are the things that should go.

AAP Centers
FLES and Magnet programs. These are wants not needs.
High Schools should charge for Ap and IB tests unless FARM.
Cut bloat at Gatehouse - especially equity department.

Let’s start with that.

FLES should not be cut you ignorant Anglocentric buffoon.

Our kids should have the ability to learn a foreign language, since it will allow them to become worldly thinkers.

Spanish, French, Arabic, German, Mandarin, Japanese, and Korean are some of the most widely spoken languages.

Depriving our students of linguistic experience is more harmful than beneficial.

But stay Anglisch my friend,

You do understand that FLES is not immersion right? It’s a program exclusive to elementary schools where kids get 1 hour of a watered down foreign language instruction once per week. FLES is a total waste of resources.

Immersion on the other hand is a great program.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These are the things that should go.

AAP Centers
FLES and Magnet programs. These are wants not needs.
High Schools should charge for Ap and IB tests unless FARM.
Cut bloat at Gatehouse - especially equity department.

Let’s start with that.

FLES should not be cut you ignorant Anglocentric buffoon.

Our kids should have the ability to learn a foreign language, since it will allow them to become worldly thinkers.

Spanish, French, Arabic, German, Mandarin, Japanese, and Korean are some of the most widely spoken languages.

Depriving our students of linguistic experience is more harmful than beneficial.

But stay Anglisch my friend,

Anonymous wrote:These are the things that should go.

AAP Centers
FLES and Magnet programs. These are wants not needs.
High Schools should charge for Ap and IB tests unless FARM.
Cut bloat at Gatehouse - especially equity department.

Let’s start with that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much FCPS would save if we got rid of AAP Centers.

I'm not saying get rid of AAP, I'm saying Centers. That would significantly reduce bussing costs and reduce the number of AARTs that are required.

This would reduce bussing but how would it reduce staff? With no centers FCPS would need to keep an AART at each school.

AARTs at LLIV schools are part-time. Two schools can share an AART. This would reduce staff. But it would be a huge reduction in bus costs. Like in the millions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much FCPS would save if we got rid of AAP Centers.

I'm not saying get rid of AAP, I'm saying Centers. That would significantly reduce bussing costs and reduce the number of AARTs that are required.

This would reduce bussing but how would it reduce staff? With no centers FCPS would need to keep an AART at each school.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much FCPS would save if we got rid of AAP Centers.

I'm not saying get rid of AAP, I'm saying Centers. That would significantly reduce bussing costs and reduce the number of AARTs that are required.

This would reduce bussing but how would it reduce staff? With no centers FCPS would need to keep an AART at each school.

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much FCPS would save if we got rid of AAP Centers.

I'm not saying get rid of AAP, I'm saying Centers. That would significantly reduce bussing costs and reduce the number of AARTs that are required.