Anonymous wrote:The middle schools are reasonably tightly clustered, as are the high schools. Some differences, but none of the schools are failing (excluding Arlington Community High, which should really be evaluated differently, IMO).
Anonymous wrote:We knew this would happen when Youngkin’s board of ed proposed the new standards a year or so ago. They knew then how many and which schools would be labeled “off track” and “needs intensive support.” They’re new labels applied to the same test scores that used to be considered okay. It’s all part of the relentless attack on public schools to argue for vouchers and a two-tiered system.
Anonymous wrote:We knew this would happen when Youngkin’s board of ed proposed the new standards a year or so ago. They knew then how many and which schools would be labeled “off track” and “needs intensive support.” They’re new labels applied to the same test scores that used to be considered okay. It’s all part of the relentless attack on public schools to argue for vouchers and a two-tiered system.
Anonymous wrote:We knew this would happen when Youngkin’s board of ed proposed the new standards a year or so ago. They knew then how many and which schools would be labeled “off track” and “needs intensive support.” They’re new labels applied to the same test scores that used to be considered okay. It’s all part of the relentless attack on public schools to argue for vouchers and a two-tiered system.
Anonymous wrote:We knew this would happen when Youngkin’s board of ed proposed the new standards a year or so ago. They knew then how many and which schools would be labeled “off track” and “needs intensive support.” They’re new labels applied to the same test scores that used to be considered okay. It’s all part of the relentless attack on public schools to argue for vouchers and a two-tiered system.
Anonymous wrote:We knew this would happen when Youngkin’s board of ed proposed the new standards a year or so ago. They knew then how many and which schools would be labeled “off track” and “needs intensive support.” They’re new labels applied to the same test scores that used to be considered okay. It’s all part of the relentless attack on public schools to argue for vouchers and a two-tiered system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its hard to see that EVERY single North Arlington elementary schools are distinguished. Its a hard fact of life.
Agreed! But close to 1/3 of all APS elementary schools Needs Intensive Support? We're not even close to talking about Distinguished. Is it too much to ask that a school like Long Branch is On Track?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work at another school that is on the list and IMO it’s justified. I am neither a fan or huge critic of Duran though I feel he is partially responsible for some of what is happening. When I talk to friends across the county they have similar concerns. The way we are educating special education students and ELs is not supportive in many cases. At the same time there have been huge cultural shifts in parenting that are impacting achievement.
Would love to hear more about cultural shifts in parenting as I think that could be understated factor. I have some ideas, but not sure if they are the same as how you are seeing it from your vantage point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its hard to see that EVERY single North Arlington elementary schools are distinguished. Its a hard fact of life.
Agreed! But close to 1/3 of all APS elementary schools Needs Intensive Support? We're not even close to talking about Distinguished. Is it too much to ask that a school like Long Branch is On Track?