Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think its kind of crazy how a small club like GFR is the second best behind the biggest club in VA
It’s also crazy that their pre ECNL boys teams are at the bottom of the rankings. Seems like the older teams are stronger because they formed before all the recent drama and have opted to stick together, whereas younger families probably felt no loyalty to the club or teammates.
Does it matter if pre ECNL teams are not good or even 13-14. If they are not high school aged it’s all about getting better not results.
Correct. It does not. But don’t tell people in this forum that.
Sure, but I can’t imagine it’s a competitive training environment if the team is losing like that every week. It suggests they don’t have kids ready to play at that level. What was happening with the more successful teams when they were U11-U12? I would bet they weren’t getting crushed every game.
There are ways you can coach to win at those ages — kickball, take advantage of physical development differences, pure aggressiveness, too early dedication to GK position, teaching set plays that don’t translate, eg, on corners— that don’t necessarily mean that the kids are developing technical skills or learning playing styles that will lead to winning at high school ages. The American obsession with playing up to 9v9 or 11v11 too early instead of continuing small sided play is part of this. Sure, a team getting blown out every week may not be developing well, but there is little reason to think a team that is 10-0 at u12 will necessarily be better at u15 than a team that is 6-4 at u12. You need to see how they are playing to get a sense of whether there’s a focus on individual development. For instance, a team that is learning the develop play from the back under pressure might lose some games as a result but will learn more than a team that has the goalie punt every time even if that wins games.