Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/3903896/fairfax-county-public-schools-backs-away-pronoun-bathroom-legal-fight/?utm_social_post_id=612363357&utm_social_handle_id=18956073
Not sure how this affects the suit against FCPS by the feds.
Wow. Just read the article. In this case, the boy didn’t even identify as transgender but was still allowed to use the girls locker room due to “bullying” in the boys locker room. The girl is read was directed to use the stalls and the boy was allowed use of the girls locker room. This is truly sick and bonkers.
FCPS does not believe it’s “sick and bonkers” (even though it is).
FCPS believes it is “social justice.”
FCPS also believes that if you dare disagree, then you must be a hateful, bigoted, MAGA, and your child must be punished for such beliefs.
And FCPS was and is wrong and has learned people are fed up with this nonsense
Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/3903896/fairfax-county-public-schools-backs-away-pronoun-bathroom-legal-fight/?utm_social_post_id=612363357&utm_social_handle_id=18956073
Not sure how this affects the suit against FCPS by the feds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“The little-noticed update on the court docket means the district will pay nominal damages of $50 and Doe’s accrued attorney’s fees.”
What was the point of the lawsuit if the plaintiff settled for $50? There is no ruling about the constitutionality of the policy. The case just goes away. Sounds like a win for FCPS.
The attorney's fees will not be $50.00.
It is a moral victory for the girl and all girls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/3903896/fairfax-county-public-schools-backs-away-pronoun-bathroom-legal-fight/?utm_social_post_id=612363357&utm_social_handle_id=18956073
Not sure how this affects the suit against FCPS by the feds.
Wow. Just read the article. In this case, the boy didn’t even identify as transgender but was still allowed to use the girls locker room due to “bullying” in the boys locker room. The girl is read was directed to use the stalls and the boy was allowed use of the girls locker room. This is truly sick and bonkers.
FCPS does not believe it’s “sick and bonkers” (even though it is).
FCPS believes it is “social justice.”
FCPS also believes that if you dare disagree, then you must be a hateful, bigoted, MAGA, and your child must be punished for such beliefs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/3903896/fairfax-county-public-schools-backs-away-pronoun-bathroom-legal-fight/?utm_social_post_id=612363357&utm_social_handle_id=18956073
Not sure how this affects the suit against FCPS by the feds.
Wow. Just read the article. In this case, the boy didn’t even identify as transgender but was still allowed to use the girls locker room due to “bullying” in the boys locker room. The girl is read was directed to use the stalls and the boy was allowed use of the girls locker room. This is truly sick and bonkers.
Anonymous wrote:“The little-noticed update on the court docket means the district will pay nominal damages of $50 and Doe’s accrued attorney’s fees.”
What was the point of the lawsuit if the plaintiff settled for $50? There is no ruling about the constitutionality of the policy. The case just goes away. Sounds like a win for FCPS.