Anonymous wrote:There’s nothing wrong with ICE.
They are heroes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do things this way? Rather than paying a private company to help ICE why not hire more immigration judges and allow them to WFH and have virtual hearings. That way you’re actually supporting middle class wages rather than lining the pockets of tech ceos.
The country already has plenty of immigration judges. The problem is that 90% of them are tied up dealing with folks already in the country illegally. Once those folks are purged and deported, as required by US law, then those immigration judges can pivot an focus on dealing with applications to enter the country legally. The plan is already in place but instead of fixing the problem, you want to use a band-aid (hiring more judges) which is always what the left pushes. Never fix a problem. Just throw more resources at the symptoms. Either way, the current plan will have this fixed once law is enforced and these folks are all deported.
Anonymous wrote:There’s nothing wrong with ICE.
They are heroes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree 100%.
After this correction has been implemented though, we should return to controlled levels of workforce immigration. Not H1B, but labor, and limit to people whose values align and can integrate successfully (I believe many Hispanics fit this profile).
Just curious - did you vote for Bush #2? He’s the one that instituted the temporary protective status that brought in millions of immigrants from war torn countries bc he was too afraid of public perception of real immigration reform.
Also, did you support US involvement in Iraq, Iran, Syria, South America (and sanctions on Venezuela) that led to destabilization and chaos and those countries? If so, do you think it’s ok for us to leave our mess behind?
To be clear I think Biden was horrible on immigration but he was just another mainstream politician pushing things down the road.
But Trump is just a meanie rounding up college students traveling home for Thanksgiving, fathers of military service members, and construction workers paying social security taxes.
We need a leader confident and smart enough to push forward immigration reform on the merits of what is in the best interest of our country.
That’s just not Trump. Certainly not Miller!
I’m too young to have voted for Bush 2 but I think we need to stop messing around in other countries affairs and if we do mess things up, we need to help put things right. That help might not be letting them all into the U.S. though. Better to prevent it and stop messing with other countries. That includes protecting our own borders from trafficking and the illegal movement of people and substances, not least because both of those things create destabilizing forces within their countries of origin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree 100%.
After this correction has been implemented though, we should return to controlled levels of workforce immigration. Not H1B, but labor, and limit to people whose values align and can integrate successfully (I believe many Hispanics fit this profile).
Just curious - did you vote for Bush #2? He’s the one that instituted the temporary protective status that brought in millions of immigrants from war torn countries bc he was too afraid of public perception of real immigration reform.
Also, did you support US involvement in Iraq, Iran, Syria, South America (and sanctions on Venezuela) that led to destabilization and chaos and those countries? If so, do you think it’s ok for us to leave our mess behind?
To be clear I think Biden was horrible on immigration but he was just another mainstream politician pushing things down the road.
But Trump is just a meanie rounding up college students traveling home for Thanksgiving, fathers of military service members, and construction workers paying social security taxes.
We need a leader confident and smart enough to push forward immigration reform on the merits of what is in the best interest of our country.
That’s just not Trump. Certainly not Miller!
Anonymous wrote:The backlog in immigration courts has dropped under Trump.Anonymous wrote:Why do things this way? Rather than paying a private company to help ICE why not hire more immigration judges and allow them to WFH and have virtual hearings. That way you’re actually supporting middle class wages rather than lining the pockets of tech ceos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Temporary work visas for manual labor, pathways to citizenship, more administrative judges to handle the asylum load - gee its almost like we have already had this legislation a number of times and the GOP killed it at every turn, even when they wrote it.
I don’t agree with pathways to citizenship or more judges.
Dead nd short term visas and not accepting any asylees is the way imho
The backlog in immigration courts has dropped under Trump.Anonymous wrote:Why do things this way? Rather than paying a private company to help ICE why not hire more immigration judges and allow them to WFH and have virtual hearings. That way you’re actually supporting middle class wages rather than lining the pockets of tech ceos.
Anonymous wrote:Temporary work visas for manual labor, pathways to citizenship, more administrative judges to handle the asylum load - gee its almost like we have already had this legislation a number of times and the GOP killed it at every turn, even when they wrote it.
Anonymous wrote:Why do things this way? Rather than paying a private company to help ICE why not hire more immigration judges and allow them to WFH and have virtual hearings. That way you’re actually supporting middle class wages rather than lining the pockets of tech ceos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do things this way? Rather than paying a private company to help ICE why not hire more immigration judges and allow them to WFH and have virtual hearings. That way you’re actually supporting middle class wages rather than lining the pockets of tech ceos.
To what end? To churn out endless questionable asylum cases?
Anonymous wrote:Why do things this way? Rather than paying a private company to help ICE why not hire more immigration judges and allow them to WFH and have virtual hearings. That way you’re actually supporting middle class wages rather than lining the pockets of tech ceos.
Anonymous wrote:Temporary work visas for manual labor, pathways to citizenship, more administrative judges to handle the asylum load - gee its almost like we have already had this legislation a number of times and the GOP killed it at every turn, even when they wrote it.