Anonymous wrote:I’m not a Wes hater, but I found the campus and surrounding area to be kind of drab and depressing. I wouldn’t rule it out on that basis as an adult, but as a teen who probably toured more bucolic campuses on the same road trip, I might put it lower on the list.
Anonymous wrote:Wesleyan, Bates, Oberlin are lefty liberal woke havens.
Anonymous wrote:Wesleyan is proof, in my opinion, that the other top lacs are extremely greedy. Wesleyan has the finances to have 3000 students (1000 more than Williams, nearly 2000 more than Pomona and Swarthmore), graduate programs, advanced labs, new facilities, full financial aid, no legacy, and less than half the endowment of all of them. Mind you, they offer similar programs like tutorials! It really should be a T5 institution.
Anonymous wrote:Both pomona and wes aren't all that impressive when it comes to academic horsepower of their students
Pomona has 1766 undergrads
436 freshman
155 freshman submitted sat
only 116 have sat above 1500
Wes has 3805 undergrads
824 freshman
335 freshman submitted an sat
only 83 have above 1500
Anonymous wrote:Both pomona and wes aren't all that impressive when it comes to academic horsepower of their students
Pomona has 1766 undergrads
436 freshman
155 freshman submitted sat
only 116 have sat above 1500
Wes has 3805 undergrads
824 freshman
335 freshman submitted an sat
only 83 have above 1500
what makes Wesleyan great? What corporate messaging are you referring to?Anonymous wrote:I had the pleasure of meeting Michael Roth at a Scripps College Event, and it was so amazing to talk to a president who truly cared about his institution beyond the dollars. He clearly understands what makes Wesleyan great and doesn't muddy that with ridiculous corporate messaging about academia.
Anonymous wrote:Wesleyan, Bates, Oberlin are lefty liberal woke havens.