Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leaving aside the absurdity of the inclusion of Ivies and Stanford, why does NYU list STEM schools like CalTech, MIT, Rice and CMU as peers?
NYU is not a STEM school, less than a quarter of NYU students are STEM.
BU and USC are peer institutions, along with possibly Cal and UCLA (more STEM students but test blind). All are also diverse.
NYU has an up and coming engineering program but agreed that it isn't anywhere near a peer of those schools. But it shouldn't be ignored either.
Stern is fine but not great - Wharton safety (which is not a bad thing). Tisch is top notch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leaving aside the absurdity of the inclusion of Ivies and Stanford, why does NYU list STEM schools like CalTech, MIT, Rice and CMU as peers?
NYU is not a STEM school, less than a quarter of NYU students are STEM.
BU and USC are peer institutions, along with possibly Cal and UCLA (more STEM students but test blind). All are also diverse.
NYU has an up and coming engineering program but agreed that it isn't anywhere near a peer of those schools. But it shouldn't be ignored either.
Stern is fine but not great - Wharton safety (which is not a bad thing). Tisch is top notch.
a safety lol. damn you are stupid
Almost no one choosing Stern over Wharton. Full stop. Not even close. I am not insulting Stern. Great school. Better than almost every other undergrad business program. But Wharton is far ahead of it.
And your childish tone proves how little value one should place in your opinion. Grow up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leaving aside the absurdity of the inclusion of Ivies and Stanford, why does NYU list STEM schools like CalTech, MIT, Rice and CMU as peers?
NYU is not a STEM school, less than a quarter of NYU students are STEM.
BU and USC are peer institutions, along with possibly Cal and UCLA (more STEM students but test blind). All are also diverse.
NYU has an up and coming engineering program but agreed that it isn't anywhere near a peer of those schools. But it shouldn't be ignored either.
Stern is fine but not great - Wharton safety (which is not a bad thing). Tisch is top notch.
a safety lol. damn you are stupid
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leaving aside the absurdity of the inclusion of Ivies and Stanford, why does NYU list STEM schools like CalTech, MIT, Rice and CMU as peers?
NYU is not a STEM school, less than a quarter of NYU students are STEM.
BU and USC are peer institutions, along with possibly Cal and UCLA (more STEM students but test blind). All are also diverse.
NYU has an up and coming engineering program but agreed that it isn't anywhere near a peer of those schools. But it shouldn't be ignored either.
Stern is fine but not great - Wharton safety (which is not a bad thing). Tisch is top notch.
Anonymous wrote:Idiots here probably have no idea that NYU has the strongest appied math department in the country.
Anonymous wrote:Leaving aside the absurdity of the inclusion of Ivies and Stanford, why does NYU list STEM schools like CalTech, MIT, Rice and CMU as peers?
NYU is not a STEM school, less than a quarter of NYU students are STEM.
BU and USC are peer institutions, along with possibly Cal and UCLA (more STEM students but test blind). All are also diverse.
Anonymous wrote:Syracuse and NYU are both peers in terms of admitting mediocre full pay studentsAnonymous wrote:Harvard is not an NYU peer (too high).
But then again, neither is Syracuse (too low).
NYU ' 15
Syracuse and NYU are both peers in terms of admitting mediocre full pay studentsAnonymous wrote:Harvard is not an NYU peer (too high).
But then again, neither is Syracuse (too low).
NYU ' 15
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So only private universities are the peers?
No. UMich, UT, UNC, UVA for B-School.
Anonymous wrote:So only private universities are the peers?